Ramblings of an old Doc
Published on May 19, 2011 By DrJBHL In Personal Computing

 

Toni Bowers (techrepublic) reports about Foxconn (in Shenzhen, PRC) where iPhones are made, there have been 11 suicides – workers jumping out of windows.

They’ve come up with a fix:

 

To be fair, they’re also upping wages by 50% and that action was accompanied by some long-term changes that the industrial giant’s leaders hope will change the lives and well-being of its employees before they get to the point of suicidal thoughts as well: They’ve also set up a ‘round the clock counseling center staffed by some 100 trained workers. I can’t tell whether there are psychologists in the center or not, but I’d think that would be appropriate.

Honestly? Wouldn’t you think they’d start getting active after the first or second? Can you imagine what the working conditions were?

“Foxconn made matters worse with a slow and initially clumsy response. In an exclusive interview with Bloomberg Businessweek, Gou conceded that he didn't immediately grasp the significance of the suicides. "I should be honest with you," he says. "The first one, second one, and third one, I did not see this as a serious problem. We had around 800,000 employees, and here [in Longhua] we are about 2.1 square kilometers. At the moment, I'm feeling guilty. But at that moment, I didn't think I should be taking full responsibility." After the fifth suicide, in March, Gou says, "I decided to do something different." – Terry Gou

Here’s some more inspiration from Mr. Gou:

Although drab and utilitarian, the campus is a fully functioning city, with fast-food joints, ATMs, Olympic-size swimming pools, huge LED screens that flash public-service announcements and cartoons, and a bookstore that sells, among other things, the Chinese-language translation of the Harvard Business Review. Prominent on display are biographies of Gou, one of which collects his many aphorisms, including "work itself is a type of joy," "a harsh environment is a good thing," "hungry people have especially clear minds," and "an army of one thousand is easy to get, one general is tough to find."- ibid

I guess he likes his folks to be really  joyful.

They’ve also engaged a firm (Bursen-Marstellar) to do PR work…. guess the image doesn’t sit well in the West. Mr. Guo amassed his estimated $9.5 billion dollar fortune from a $7,500 loan from his mom.

Link to the follow up article to this post.

Update (5.24.11): Plant Closed For Safety Inspection


Comments (Page 5)
5 PagesFirst 3 4 5 
on May 20, 2011

Dr Guy
Gold has no value (you cannot eat it or wear it or burn it).

Sounding a little too close to the dog's philosophy of life....if you can't eat it or screw it...you piss on it...

'value' to you may be determined by whether something can be eaten, worn or burnt....but in reality even that falls over.  Gold CAN be worn....and has been since its 'discovery'.  And apparently you CAN also eat it....it's used toadorn such banalities as icecream.

Burning it doesn't do a lot other than to allow it to be shaped into all sorts of things [melting/casting] as being a noble metal and soft it's ideal.

I'd be suggesting round about now to find a better analogy....one not quite so full of holes...

on May 20, 2011

Gold has no value (you cannot eat it or wear it or burn it).

Being the evil materialist that I am, if anyone wants to unload any of that "worthless" gold just PM me and I'll be more than happy to relieve you of your burden. "Worthless" silver, cash or coin is also welcome... 

on May 21, 2011

Dr. Guy, re: your comments to me:   You may accuse me of crying victim hood all you like, (thats a jump in logic), and a mean spirited dig, (hows that for a jump in logic?).  However, the point I was trying, apparently unsuccessfully, to make was simply this:   the fact they you and your corporate 'friends' and doing fine in this 'economy,' does not necessarily mean the economy is working for all, or even most Americans.  Indeed, it is not.  Your little corner may be all hunky dory, well and good for you.  But remember most people are not enterpreateur (spelling?) types, as apparently, you are.  (More power to you!).  But participation in, and benefiting from systematic economic, political, social, etc. systems that  take advantage of people less intelligent, less educated, born with less family connections, born with less, or no inherited monies, born and reared in homes that are incredibly dis-functional, in part , because the only 'jobs' available are working 2 or 3 part time positions at mininum wage, etc. , does make you partially culpable.  You, and i participate in it.   Playing the individualism card is all fine and good - Horatio Alger myth, etc...  (leaving off that the famous hero of 'pull yourself up by your bootstraps' stories, were actually veiled, read between the lines, man-young boy sex stories.)  Anyway, go... cancel all your insurance, tell the fire department, and police, not to come to your home, etc.  Refuse to accept any protection from the sons and daughters of the poor who die in uniform ...  Point is, we all are connected in a vast web of relationships...some obvious, and some not so obvious.  You and I both live in the web.  You state that you and your friends have done well for yourselves.  Bravo.  But what you do affects the rest of us.  What you say, how you vote, etc., all affect the rest of us.  Not as victims, as you (in my opinion, callously) charged me, but as consequences that ripple through the web of life.  

Is your home being foreclosed because you fell for one of those  snake oil mortgage deals disguised as a government 'program.?"  Is the government in the process of trying to 'privatize' your SS, etc., so that, being the simple souls most of us are, we can't make head 'n tail of the complicated legalize and dizzying array of financial products:  and we get screwed?  (or worse, the 'private enterprise/corp that our SS trust fund allotment end up in goes bankrupt, because of insider theft / embezzlement, etc.). Do you support efforts to get the damn feds out of intrusions into the 'so-called free market?   How many more savings and loans must go under because of insider trading and corporate scheming?  How many more banks must be collapsed by insider thieves?  (The people of Iceland did the right thing, you want the money swindled from the Icelandic Bank - that caused it to collapse, go after the corporate thieves, not we citizens / and our public monies.)  

You blithe comment that 'all is fine with me and my corporate friends,' made in the context of this thread, in the context of institutionalized  slavery of foreigners, child laborers,  who make many of the products American corps sell at obscene profits, company store-ism, and blatant in-humane abuse practiced as policy in that (forced) workplace of (Shezhen?) struck me, as rather self centered, if not down right selfish, but definitely callus.  People who don't help you make money, directly, don't matter?  Then you took opportunity to accuse me of playing the victim card.  Well, my corporate friends and I got ours, proves all the rest of you who feel that the economic system is stacked against you are just plain wrong, and if you try to redress it an any collective fashion, or discussing it on a forum with someone who doesn't seem to understand all the connections, you are playing the victim card.  Aren't corporations and political parties collectivized entities?  

 Finally, your comment, 'all is fine with me and my corporate friends,'(who probably pay you more that mininum wage) just came across, to me , as  'I got mine, who the hell cares if I care about anyone else?'  OK, fine.  You and your cabal may have a wonderful life, and you may do very well... but you do so well, in part, on the backs of, via the suffering of, at the expense of, and on the deaths of others whom you do not see becuase they are not living in the house next door.  if you feel striving for 'fair trade' practices is crying 'victim',' so be it.    If you feel my calling attention to your  seemingly  self-absorbed comment,  while using your comment to imply there is nothing wrong with the system of webbed relationships we all participate in, and to justify the ever increasing amounts of wealth accumulating in the top 5% of American families, so be it.  You may consider I am playing victim, but you, sir, came across as a callous, uncaring, selfish "i got mine, (and so do my corporate friends), so screw all of you," kind of person.  OK, screw me, label me a victim.  But you (and I) still benefit disproportionately (apparently you more than I - not that it truly matters) from the systemic, intentional, abuse, suffering, and just plain oppression of others.  These 'others' may not live in your neighborhood.  And, at least for now, the more egregious of these abuses are still, technically illegal, here in the USA. But you and I still benefit from their, to use your label, 'victim-hood,'  from their suffering and deaths.     

i am sure you are a wonderful, 'stand up' kinda guy, very polished, etc.  You are fun at parties, and discuss, eloquently, all sorts of interesting things.   You might even go to Rotary!  And I am sure you lavish your love on your family.  (This is not sarcasm...)  But your callous disregard for the human costs, paid by others in the web of relationships in which we all participate, and from which you benefit disproportionately, truly sickens me.  Your prosperous little corner exists, in part, because of the suffering, and deaths of others with less power, and fewer allies.  But that does not matter, because you don't know me (us) (them) personally, so any benefits you derive, indirectly (via the web of relationships, from me (and other creatures of my ilk) are irrelevant to you.  Such callousness will help transform the nice town in "its a wonderful Life," into a worldwide Pottersville.   

I am so happy you and your corporate friends are doing so well.  (seriously).  Social Darwinism has served you well.  But your callous disregard for others outside your immediate field of vision is very sad, and does not bode well for the rest of us.  Good night and good luck.

 

on May 23, 2011

'value' to you may be determined by whether something can be eaten, worn or burnt....but in reality even that falls over.

I should have said "intrinsic value".  In other words, what is necessary to sustain life.  Beyond that, we assign value based upon our own belief system.  So gold gets a high value because of our belief in it.  So the same with currency.  I love to hear the gold standard people yapping about returning to it.  Why?  Other than being able to point to an object (There it is!), it is no more valuable than currency which is based upon faith of the holders (can't point to that).

So the burn, eat or wear was referring to the basic necessities of life.  Not the luxuries of life.

on May 23, 2011

navigatsio
Being the evil materialist that I am, if anyone wants to unload any of that "worthless" gold just PM me and I'll be more than happy to relieve you of your burden. "Worthless" silver, cash or coin is also welcome...

You are a very noble person!

on May 23, 2011

Nimbin
if i had to make Iphones i would top myself to. Only kidding. This company needs to closely examine it's working practices as to why their staff are so unhappy.

The problem being though is that the company could give a damn about why their staff are unhappy.  Again, all they care about is profit.

on May 23, 2011

Companies over here are the same, abusing laws and rights and only care when they get caught. This can be hard as our labor board must give 24 hours notice before entering a plant with complaints. Hmmm, should the police give a 24 hour notice before they raid your house? A labor inspector should be givin the power to enter a plant that has complaints of safety violations without the phone call "We have complaints and you got 24 hrs to clean up the evidence before we come".

on May 23, 2011

Dr Guy
You are a very noble person!

And honest about it too. Seems that if you're not struggling, impoverished or a victim of circumstances, something, someone, or whatever, you're kinda villainized on most forums these days. I have a lot of stuff and I'm neither ashamed or embarrassed about it because I earned it wth no hand out, hand up or help from anyone but my own self. 

on May 23, 2011

alleeez ! faites une pose, ça changera rien de toute façon

on May 24, 2011

This is why it's often more important to take a job you like for less pay than a job you hate for a bigger check.  My aunt had a job she hated at the post office for decades, but refused to look into alternatives.  It was easy, it was boring, it paid better than anything else she was likely to ever get.  She was miserable, no fun to be around at gatherings, and most family members limited contact with her to once a her.  She just droned away month after month.  After she finally retired she was a new person.  Suddenly she made interesting conversation, was more interested in doing things, and suddenly visiting that aunt wasn't a chore for everyone.

Was that worth it?  Was years of living as a zombie worth that retirement pension?

on Jul 16, 2011

re: above post ;  aye, but in my neck of the woods, there are way too few, living wage, jobs (forget retirement) available to the bulk of the population.  Everything is part time, no medical, or vacation, often with crazily scheduled shifts.  Some people are working 12-14 hours a day, 5 and 6 and 7 days a week, at 4 or 5 'employers, at a pittance, just to pay for rent on a barely livable apartment, and feed themselves and their 1 or 2 children. 

labor laws have been gutted in most of the usa.  And employers have reaped a windfall of cheap labor with no responsibilities to the 'people' working.   But don't dare, as a part time employee, leave with out 'proper notice' or you will get 'blackballed,' etc.  True reciprocity for all but 'professional' jobs is gone from the 'labor market,' here.  Next stop, the company store? Indentured servitude for your food and shelter? 

-------------------------------

hey navagatso;  Sorry you feel kinda 'villianized' on some of these threads.  It is not, at least on my part, personal. Indeed I honor hard work, and equitable pay. You work hard and deserve a decent quality of life in exchange for your hard work.  Absolutely.  And I, for one, would never suggest anything less. 

And there are many threads on many boards that honor, and extol the 'pull yourself up by your own bootstraps' type of experience.  Nothing wrong with feeling a sense of accomplishment. Some of us, however, in addition to playing Stardock games, etc., also find comfort in connecting with others who have similar feelings, issues, concerns, etc.  I think there are two basic issues (or areas?) which, at least for me, these specific threads allow me to discuss and vent: 

first, the systemic inequalities inherent in the web of relationships in which we all, you, and i, live within; and from which we disproportionally benefit.  Child laborers in china work just as hard as do you and I, but get so much less.  Yet the fruit of their labor is sold here in the USA at a rediciliously low price (compared to USA made items) and we, you and i benefit from their suffering. I support the 'fair trade' concepts, and practices, and I almost never buy anything new - as i strive to distance myself from directly benefiting from products made by slave labor, child labor, and oppressed .. you get the idea.  

The second, is the issue of who has rigged this game and who benifits the most.  The so called free market, bankster pyramids, uber corporations (who are not really people but soulless machines with currency as blood) etc., have rigged the web of relationships in which we all participate,  so that they reap tremendous 'profits.' They then use this value they have taken from working people to subvert the policies and politics of so called democratic countries.  And, of course, to what extent do these economic imperialistic - economic forces / entities, when influencing current governmental structures, subvert true democracy, and the lives of the people that democratic government was originally established to serve?  To what extent do governments actually serve the uber rich, and the uber corporations, (which are the primary instruments of the uber-rich), at the expense of the people?

So, it really isn't a dig on you, Navagatso, nor on your hard work.  Except, perhaps, in the very limited sense that, in spite of your hard work, some of what you have, might not have come into your hands at the low prices you paid, except for the systemic injustice of the web of relationships in which you purchased those products.  And bear in mind, I, too, have benefited from lower and unfair prices.  So, when you feel kinda 'villianized,' I also include myself as a villain.  What I continue to hope for, is that we, as a people, will finally fight harder to make it all fairer, and eliminate the slave labor of many other nations.  i hope you understand.  You sound like good people.  Don't take this little set of threads where some of us can discuss all this as anything more than one of the few venues we have.  And, I for one, appreciate StarDock (which is not an 'uber-corp) for allowing gamers to also discuss this area of life here.   

As an aside, a very ancient 'constitution' (c 1,500 BCE) had some very remarkable rubrics:  If you find a nest, you may harvest either the bird or the egg, but not eat both. You may harvest the adult cow, or its calf, but not consume both.  Loans are made at zero interest, always.  Every 50 years, all property reverts back to the original owning families, persons.  No one is allowed to accumulate indefinitely so as to become 'too big to fail.'  Every generation (or every other generation) gets to start with a relatively even slate - no dynastic, or rich families (corporations) growing until they dwarf and can lord it over regular people.  Unfortunately that wisdom has been lost, or subverted by .. well doesn't matter anymore.  A house of cards has been built atop that constitution, and the result bears little resemblance to the principles that were probably intended, but neither can the cards be separated form that ancient constitution.   And no one had proposed anything better. 

 

 

 

on Jul 17, 2011

This was inevitable- we're going to have a race to the bottom- with only a few endgames possible.

 

As long as we have huge global wealth inequality, things like this won't change.  It will take centuries to fix this.

 

 

5 PagesFirst 3 4 5