Ramblings of an old Doc
Published on March 21, 2015 By DrJBHL In Personal Computing

 

 

This has to rank way up there on the creepy scale.

You remember the creepy Samsung TV that eavesdrops on conversations in the room its located in? If you don’t, it’s here. The truth? TVs since becoming “smart” and “taking orders” by voice command (guess what other appliances do that?) and Stuxnet – you can’t say anything in your own home (or anywhere else they are). Samsung’s privacy policy:

“To provide you the Voice Recognition feature, some voice commands may be transmitted (along with information about your device, including device identifiers) to a third-party service that converts speech to text or to the extent necessary to provide the Voice Recognition features to you. In addition, Samsung may collect and your device may capture voice commands and associated texts so that we can provide you with Voice Recognition features and evaluate and improve the features. Please be aware that if your spoken words include personal or other sensitive information, that information will be among the data captured and transmitted to a third party through your use of Voice Recognition.” – Samsung

Samsung’s answer? “If you don't want your voice commands collected, you can disable the functionality (even though you lose some core TV features in the process).” Perfect asses.

Well, Mattel Corp. now has a great new Barbie doll: The “Hello Barbie”. It connects via Wi-Fi and also records kids’ commands and sends them to an external server “In order to improve voice command tech.” Really? Actually, it will be recording kids’ conversations and routing them to a corporation where all their likes and dislikes will be analyzed and info will be collected on their families and more…in fact anywhere the doll is located. In other words, your home has been bugged without a court warrant! New creepy level achieved!

Mattel is promising that security and privacy has been their top priority while crafting a doll that learns what kids like:

"Mattel and ToyTalk, the San Francisco-based start-up that created the technology used in the doll, say the privacy and security of the technology have been their top priority. "Mattel is committed to safety and security, and Hello Barbie conforms to applicable government standards," Mattel said in a statement." – Techdirt

I’m sure. In fact, the companies rushing face-first toward the billions in potential revenues from the "Internet of Things" market are so fixated on profit, that security and privacy have been afterthoughts -- if a thought at all. That's before we even discuss how this collected voice data creates a wonderful new target for nosy governments courtesy of the Third Party Doctrine.

Well, not to go over the edge, these “privacy standards” are quite concerning. After reading about this latest, I shopped Barbie. The flag really should have been tattered.

I hope this “smart device” craze causes folks to go back to plain old TVs, fridges and Raggedy Anne dolls…that are insentient and just do what they’re supposed to do.

I just hope Raggedy Anne isn’t going undercover.

Source:

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20150317/06423830341/barbie-joins-growing-chorus-people-devices-spying-you.shtml


Comments (Page 1)
6 Pages1 2 3  Last
on Mar 21, 2015

gosh, I thought it was illegal to record someone's conversation without permission. I'd think maybe illegal wire tapping at a minimum. But, yes, way creepy.

on Mar 21, 2015

I'd be muttering 'rock spider' and all of a sudden the idea will be dead in the water.

Time to think about protecting kids...not exploiting them.

on Mar 21, 2015

"Hi, I'm Barbie, and I'm here to farm your children."

If there were ever anything that demonstrates the mentality that the general population is merely a herd of cattle, this would have to be it.  I honestly never dreamed that a Barbie would have to ship with a privacy policy.

Let's hope that absolutely no one buys these things and it gets filed in the "Really bad idea" cabinet.

on Mar 21, 2015

People are living creatures, NOT commodities.

on Mar 21, 2015

It never ceases to amaze me how "dumb" the average person can be and how they will basically sell their soul (in terms of freedoms and privacy) for something they think of as "cool"... I like to mess with the NSA and have taped over the front facing camera of my phone and tablet just in case they ever check in with me so that they'll scratch their heads. I know they've looked into me already as I've spammed my IP for years and why would any normal law abiding citizen do such a thing?!? lol

on Mar 21, 2015

Much ado about nothing, imo. If you don't want your kids to have access to it, don't give them access to it.

The same can be said of those tvs. Obviously, the tv is going to be listening at all times if it has voice-recognition software that allows you to interact with it via voice commands. What should also be obvious is that the only way they're going to be able to improve that function is by monitoring it.

The statements made by Samsung and Mattel should go without saying, really. If you plan on using a tv that recognizes your voice and transmits data over the internet... don't go paying your bills on the phone in its vicinity.  Overreacting isn't going to change anything, and to be honest I don't really think there's anything that needs to be changed. Technology is going to advance whether you like it or not. There's really no point in fighting it. Resistance is futile...

Or maybe I'm just graciously awaiting our Cylon overlords...

on Mar 21, 2015

I kind of agree with Kevin. The real problem has more to do with parents who will allow it. No one is holding a gun to your head and making you buy this crap but if a parent thinks it is a good idea for little Jane they are at fault.

on Mar 21, 2015

Creep factor to...  11

on Mar 21, 2015

Kevin_Walter

Much ado about nothing, imo. If you don't want your kids to have access to it, don't give them access to it.

Easily said when someone tells you about it...but had the source not written the article, I certainly wouldn't have known.

How often have you researched Barbie Dolls and Third Party Privacy regulations?

Kevin_Walter

What should also be obvious is that the only way they're going to be able to improve that function is by monitoring it.

Right...and Stuxnet is a "Quality Improvement Program" as well.

Seriously???

Kevin_Walter

Resistance is futile...

Nope. I truly believe "going quietly" is not an option...which is why I wrote this article...and shopped Barbie.

on Mar 21, 2015

I guess I haven't been properly conditioned yet.  I don't think it's reasonable to expect every adult who buys a doll for a kid to wonder if that doll is sending everything the kid says to a company.  I'm sure it will be "properly" disclosed in microscopic type on some pamphlet inside the box.  The average person who buys this will probably have no idea they're buying (at a minimum- marketing) spyware in a pretty package.

Honestly I'd think that, if nothing else, the fact that the intended end consumer is not of legal age would be enough to block this.

on Mar 21, 2015

DaveRI

Honestly I'd think that, if nothing else, the fact that the intended end consumer is not of legal age would be enough to block this.

But then you'd be forgetting that the adult parent/guardian allowing the gift acts legally as the minor's agent...and therefore it isn't illegal. That the adult didn't read the ant crap sized print? "Not our fault" will say the corporations' legal representation.

on Mar 21, 2015

DrJBHL

"Not our fault" will say the corporations' legal representation.

Undoubtedly.

on Mar 21, 2015

DrJBHL

...which is why I wrote this article...and shopped Barbie
.....and you did a damn fine job on both. Thanks, Doc.

Remember, Barbie comes with G.I.Joe, she fakes it with Ken.

on Mar 21, 2015

Kevin_Walter

Much ado about nothing, imo. If you don't want your kids to have access to it, don't give them access to it.

I didn't take the OP to do with that aspect but only how far a company will stoop to infringe upon their customer's privacy.

on Mar 21, 2015

DrJBHL
Easily said when someone tells you about it...but had the source not written the article, I certainly wouldn't have known.


How often have you researched Barbie Dolls and Third Party Privacy regulations?

I'd like to think most people are intelligent enough to deduce that a doll that not only comes packaged with voice-recognition software, but also connects to the internet, is likely going to be transmitting data on that very same internet. Most people.

Right...and Stuxnet is a "Quality Improvement Program" as well.

Seriously???

Right... comparing voice recognition software in an online-enabled tv is comparable to a virus that was designed to attack and disable Uranium centrifuges is completely logical and void of any fallacy what-so-ever...

To quote you... "Seriously???"

Nope. I truly believe "going quietly" is not an option...which is why I wrote this article...and shopped Barbie.

That's fine. You do what you have to do, but my original point still stands. Someday, none of us will be here. You know what most likely will be here? Technological advancement. You're not going to stop it.

Getting all worked up about the assumed invasion of privacy born of nothing but your own refusal to believe the press release and assume malicious intent seems only marginally shy of fear mongering to me.

6 Pages1 2 3  Last