Ramblings of an old Doc

 

Russia has demanded that Google, Facebook and Twitter comply with Russian censorship laws and store all data locally. In fact, Putin signed that into law in July, 2014.

Before screaming (justifiably), we should probably realize that we (the NSA), the British (GCHQ) and so many others demand and/or do the same already. Also, it’s not like Google, et. al. don’t do the same (even censorship to some degree), only for profit.

Well, in China Google sidestepped it by setting up shop in Hong Kong. For Russia, there’s no ‘Hong Kong’ as recent events in the Ukraine should demonstrate.

Microsoft stores data in Ireland (I’m sure others try this ‘Cayman Islands data banking’ too) to avoid just this situation and create jurisdictional problems. In fact, there’s a case in appeal process about just that question of whether there is a ‘jurisdiction’ on the internet, since a Magistrate found that MS had to produce private emails and other data on FISA subpoena even when the data is stored abroad. So, the U.S. (while no active ‘censorship’ is involved, certainly the chilling effect of this will produce ‘passive’ or ‘self censorship’ and the suppression of business and science).

To those who maintain, “This is against terrorism, and if you haven’t done anything wrong, you have nothing to fear.” I say, “poppycock”. While some of it might indeed be justifiable in cases of justifiably suspected terrorists and their contacts, it isn’t for 99.999% of the public. Profiling is wrong whether electronic or physical. Random ‘stop and search’ is a Fourth Amendment violation, whether “for your own good” or “to prevent a shooting”. The case of “the ticking time bomb” they love to raise when usurping your rights (which they never apprise you of), has never been actually found to have happened, just as the TSA has never caught a terrorist.

What if they refuse? They won’t do business in Russia. It’s a short, “My way or the highway”, and Comrade K.G.B. Colonel President Putin isn’t generally noted for his willingness to compromise nor his respect for the rights of others. Yeah, I know: It’s just a matter of different definitions, a cultural thing.

The result? Bloggers will be required to ‘register’ with the government (you’re registered here as well, you just don’t know it). They’ll be closely monitored for “extremist speech, hate speech, slander and obscene language”, like saying anything negative about Putin, or suggesting all people have certain unalienable rights.

Result? A ‘Chinese Internet’, ‘Russian Internet’ an ‘Iranian Internet’ and so on. The Internet is being fragmented into political fiefdoms.

Have a great weekend.

Sources:

1. http://www.neowin.net/news/russia-wants-facebook-google-twitter-to-comply-with-censorship-laws

2. http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/apr/29/us-court-microsoft-personal-data-emails-irish-server


Comments
on Sep 27, 2014

Putin, ex KGB and a wannabe " Numero Uno", doesn't realize that his own country does not revolve around him as the recent very vocal demonstrations have shown. He's being a royal PITA because he can't get everything his own way. He'll do this that and the other thing to further his own agenda, much like Uncle Sam does. No surprise.  

on Sep 27, 2014

There is a great point that the US and UK should not have exclusive rights to spying on the whole world.

I absolutely understand some countries opposition towards that (if they can do it then so should we!).

 

It will be interesting to follow this. I feel that Putin will not stop easily.

on Sep 28, 2014

The OP was also about the fact that the internet is being fragmented by the mass data storage and sifting, along with censorship.

on Sep 28, 2014


Random ‘stop and search’ is a Fourth Amendment violation,

Every now and then it's wise to point out that the world has seven billion inhabitants.  That 'Fourth Amendmant' applies to about 300 million...or about 4%.

'Tis all about perspective of scale...

on Sep 28, 2014

Can't disagree. Too bad what applies to some doesn't apply to all. It should read that it applies to all or applies to none. IMO

on Sep 30, 2014




Random ‘stop and search’ is a Fourth Amendment violation,



Every now and then it's wise to point out that the world has seven billion inhabitants.  That 'Fourth Amendmant' applies to about 300 million...or about 4%.

'Tis all about perspective of scale...

They're American companies...

on Sep 30, 2014

OK, who will the losers be?

on Sep 30, 2014


The fragmentation of the Internet has been happening slowly for the past 5 years. It's only now where it's picking up steam. However, I like to call it "Nationalization" of the Internet, where each nation dictates how the Internet will be processed within their boarders.

Even Canada is guilty.

I want to go to .com pages, and it redirects me to .ca pages. When I quite SPECIFICALLY input .com. Very frustrating.

on Oct 01, 2014

Indeed, GFireflyE. I wonder, is that your ISP pulling hankypanky? Doesn't your security software stop 'redirects'?

 

@Elana:  "OK, who will the losers be?"

Us...all of us on the net.

 

on Oct 02, 2014

DrJBHL

They're American companies.

....and they 'only' violate the rights of 4% of the world population.

 

....bit like beimg '96% fat-free'...

on Oct 02, 2014

Meaning only that as American companies, they are subject to American law...good example, btw, though I'd do the f−¹.  

on Oct 08, 2014

DrJBHL

Indeed, GFireflyE. I wonder, is that your ISP pulling hankypanky? Doesn't your security software stop 'redirects'?

 

@Elana:  "OK, who will the losers be?"

Us...all of us on the net.

 
Ah, yes, thanks.... actually, I was surprised this freedom highway wasn't divided into 'zone' before this.  Now big brother has another tool to use.   Like what was said at the end of the movie, Sneakers, the one who controls the info controls the world.

on Oct 08, 2014

Russia has a it he same GDP as Italy.  They're not china. I'm not sure how much leverage they have.

on Oct 08, 2014

Frogboy

Russia has a it he same GDP as Italy.  They're not china. I'm not sure how much leverage they have.

 

Russia's leverage consists of (1) the Ukraine and the Baltic states are on their border, proximity; (2) they have a sizable land army; (3) they have sizable Russian populations in the aforementioned countries; (4) they have significant historical reasons to fear invasions from western European powers; (5) they had an agreement with the Western powers (nato? eu?) that the EU would not push its borders up to Russia's and recent expansion of the EU contrary to that agreement reinforces fear mentioned in #4, and; (6) do the EU / NATO nations have the will to commit significant ground forces to 'foil' secessionist forces in these countries if these 'secessionist forces' appeal to Russia for protection from oppressive governments (-ie the national governments of the Ukraine and the Baltic states)? 

on Oct 08, 2014

Providing those governments are oppressive which I doubt.