Ramblings of an old Doc

 

Three years ago, DARPA financed an IBM project to create a whole new paradigm of computing. The Result is SyNAPSE (Systems of Neuromorphic Adaptive Plastic Scalable Electronics). This chip is radically different than any of its predecessors.

“It’s a silicon core capable of digitally replicating the brain's neurons, synapses and axons. To achieve this, researchers took a dramatic departure from the conventional von Neumann computer architecture, which links internal memory and a processor with a single data channel…which isn’t at all power efficient and the problem worsens in larger systems. IBM integrated memory directly within its processors, wedding hardware with software in a design that more closely resembles the brain's cognitive structure. This severely limits data transfer speeds, but allows the system to execute multiple processes in parallel (much like humans do), while minimizing power usage.” – Engadget

This video appeared 2 years ago explaining at a simple level, cognitive computing or AI. There isn’t a good sync between the brain anatomy and his speech…the areas mentioned aren’t the ones being seen on the video, and when he mentions the thalamus, it’s the two gold oblate spheroids not the medulla/pons depicted below them (same color) anyway: http://youtu.be/agYJSdMWXYQ

So, the project has progressed…a great deal in 3 years. That original single core chip now emulates one million neurons, 256 million synapses and 4,096 synaptic cores…while requiring 70mW of power…which is 1 hearing aid battery’s worth.

This is a major achievement (I’m very impressed, but truly concerned)…the achievement is the processing of sensory data by merging and computing in parallel.

How impressive is this? Well, as Dr. Dharmendra S. Modha (IBM’s Chief Scientist) put it, “You can carry one of our boards in your backpack. You can’t carry four racks of standard computers in your backpack.”

As I said, I’m truly impressed by this and what it will bring to computing and to medical devices.

What I’m concerned about is AI in general.

Sources:

http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/18/ibms-cognitive-computing-chip-functions-like-a-human-brain-her/

http://www.engadget.com/2014/08/07/ibm-synapse-supercomputing-chip-mimics-human-brain/?utm_source=Feed_Classic_Full&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Engadget&?ncid=rss_full


Comments (Page 3)
3 Pages1 2 3 
on Aug 11, 2014

What scares me is what could this be capable of if someone got a hold of this with a more "sinister" or malicious intent? (Don't say its not possible). We have enough problems with Pirates, Hackers, and their "super virus's", and malware. Imagine intelligent learning hardware, and software unleashed capable of bypassing, and overriding any safety, firewall, encryption short of "pulling the plug".... Basically Cylon  Get your EMP weapons ready, and get ready to blacken the sky.... Oh, oops. Wrong movie reference (should have taken the blue pill)

This kind of reminds me of the Forbin Project.

on Aug 11, 2014

I remember seeing part of that film on tv. The book was probably much better. 

As I wrote above...the first day of AI might herald the last of H. sap, which is why there probably should be a "What could go wrong with this?" computer that would require those issues be dealt with before an action be initiated.

The problem with that is that it would also have to consider "What could go wrong if it isn't done?" as well. 

The thing would probably go nuts in a microsecond. I just think there's no real stopping this despite the fact that almost everyone can see horrific possibilities. There's simply no "Just because you can do this doesn't mean you should."

The "I can win." is hard wired into us...ego, if you will, and this has always caused disasters and will cause technologically advanced disasters in the future.

on Aug 12, 2014

Here's an interesting article about "Ambient Intelligence" [AmI] - for anyone interested...

http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/promises-dangers-ambient-intelligence-life/

 

on Aug 12, 2014

Campaigner

We're so early into it that when I hear people seriously talking about SkyNet and stuff I think: Fearmongering.
GOOGLE *is* SKYNET

on Aug 13, 2014

on Aug 13, 2014

Skynet doesn't need nukes then, it can just aggregate our most circumstantially incriminating search queries for a grand jury!

on Aug 13, 2014

hi,

the biggest error of all attempts of creating pseudo   ai, is assuming that a robot could one day exactly be like a human on a bionic level.

its fun to see that even ibm belives this. using an good voice and optical recognition method combined with a simple simulation and learning algorithm + a good random number generator + database program could do more than imitating human synapses what a waste of time

regards bluedxca93

3 Pages1 2 3