Ramblings of an old Doc

 

Because Google knows best. One size fits all.

Also because Google is concerned with possibly malicious extensions.

When you open Chrome, you might see this:

As usual, an article in gHacks will explain to you what to do to remedy this. There are a few things you can do, however there might be cases where the solution might not work, unfortunately.

Source:

http://www.ghacks.net/2014/05/28/unsupported-extensions-disabled-re-enable-blocked-extensions-chrome/?_m=3n%2e0038%2e1258%2ehj0ao01hy5%2e1azu


Comments (Page 1)
3 Pages1 2 3 
on May 28, 2014

on May 28, 2014

They're just not being evil.

on May 28, 2014

Just another potential revenue source. Extentions that were once free will now cost some small amount.

on May 28, 2014

I have to use Chrome to comment on skins and no notification. But then again I have no extensions.

on May 28, 2014

Another reason to use Firefox.

on May 28, 2014

Still better than IE

on May 28, 2014

This is another reason to continue to use Chrome. There have been malicious unsupported extensions that have hijacked, crippled, and compromised system security. Like anything else, the bad guys have made it harder on those that do the right thing. I for one am grateful that Google has taken this action.

 

 

on May 28, 2014

Google *is* Skynet

on May 28, 2014

Phoon

This is another reason to continue to use Chrome. There have been malicious unsupported extensions that have hijacked, crippled, and compromised system security. Like anything else, the bad guys have made it harder on those that do the right thing. I for one am grateful that Google has taken this action.

 

 

Exactly.......could not have said it better

 

kona0197

Another reason to use Firefox.

Seriously??? Firefox is no longer a 'competitive' browser in the current world.

on May 28, 2014

Phoon

This is another reason to continue to use Chrome. There have been malicious unsupported extensions that have hijacked, crippled, and compromised system security. Like anything else, the bad guys have made it harder on those that do the right thing. I for one am grateful that Google has taken this action.
 

That's really how I see it as well.

We're all unhappy at IE (even though they're the preferred target for the yutzes) and at the MS Store. 

You can't have it both ways. Either you want improved control and supervision of the extensions which make work easier, or not.

My only concerns are 'fees' AND what kind of control will there be when extensions get sold to unscrupulous people who subvert them for criminal ends. 

on May 28, 2014

Leo the Lion
Seriously??? Firefox is no longer a 'competitive' browser in the current world.

Yeah, whatever.

 

on May 29, 2014

Daiwa
They're just not being evil.

Nope... they've become GREEDY as well.  Oh, hang on a minute!  They were always greedy, it's just become a little more transparent.

Borg999
Just another potential revenue source. Extentions that were once free will now cost some small amount.

Apple's walled garden, anyone?

Yeah, so Google is saying it is necessary because of insecurities and recent attacks, but who is to say that Google itself didn't precipitate the recent attacks to use it as an excuse to do this? It truly opens the door to monetary gain through tighter control... having the ONLY key to the door to its newly formed walled garden.

I know, conspiracy theories, blah, blah, blah, but whenever something like this comes up, and the potential to raise even more money is obvious, one cannot ignore the possibility.  Frankly, I will stick with Firefox.  I never liked Chrome as a browser anyway, and given it opens a new CPU thread each time you open a new tab - the more tabs the more CPU threads - I'd prefer something that derives it's supposed 'speed improvements' differently.

Leo the Lion
Seriously??? Firefox is no longer a 'competitive' browser in the current world.

Really?  Most people I know use Firefox as their default/main browser.  I think it has something to do with their distrust of Google and dislike of IE. 

 

 

on May 29, 2014

starkers
Really? Most people I know use Firefox as their default/main browser. I think it has something to do with their distrust of Google and dislike of IE.

Certainly not the case in my circles.  I was of the mind that Firefox had gone the way of Netscape already.......certainly won't be surprised when it does.  

I think the comment above regarding Firefox not being 'competitive' in today's world is spot on.  With smartphones and tablets (that have certain other browsers 'baked-in' offering better performance etc.) becoming (if not already there) the media-consumption device more and more people reach for when wanting to 'quickly look up that thing' or to 'show that friend that cool video' etc. etc. statements such as that made by Leo the Lion should not come as a surprise.

on May 29, 2014

the_Monk
I think the comment above regarding Firefox not being 'competitive' in today's world is spot on. With smartphones and tablets (that have certain other browsers 'baked-in' offering better performance etc.) becoming (if not already there) the media-consumption device more and more people reach for when wanting to 'quickly look up that thing' or to 'show that friend that cool video' etc. etc. statements such as that made by Leo the Lion should not come as a surprise.

Are we talking apples and oranges here?  True, there are numerous mobile devices with in-built browsers, but I do believe we were talking Chrome on the desktop here.  I may be mistaken but it did appear that way... and Firefox is far from being a spent force on desktop/notebook PCs.

As for quickly looking up that thing or two - on those piddly little screens - when my niece, nephews, sister and others want to show me something they have on their phones [sometimes tablets], they plug them into my PC to watch/look at them on the bigger screen.  Granted, it might be convenient while out and about, but showing video on a 4 - 5 inch screen loses something in the presentation as well as the detail.  Yes, many phones/tablets have high resolution screens, but they pale in significance when showing the same content on a bigger hi-res screen.

Don't get me wrong, I have a mobile phone and a tablet for when I'm out, and I like them for the purpose intended, but I much prefer a desktop PC for the greater power, added peripherals and obviously, the bigger screen when at home. True, that is my preference, but I am not alone.  Even the younger members of my extended family, many of whom live on their mobile phones while out, prefer to sit at a desktop PC when at home... and I'll bet it's a scene that's repeated throughout many households around the world.

So when you speak of your circles, is that while you're out and about... or while you're in their homes?  The reason I ask.... apple and oranges... like what people do behind closed doors may be entirely different to what you see otherwise.

on May 29, 2014

the_Monk


I think the comment above regarding Firefox not being 'competitive' in today's world is spot on.  With smartphones and tablets (that have certain other browsers 'baked-in' offering better performance etc.) becoming (if not already there) the media-consumption device more and more people reach for when wanting to 'quickly look up that thing' or to 'show that friend that cool video' etc. etc. statements such as that made by Leo the Lion should not come as a surprise.

When someone mentions smartphones and tablets, the next thing I expect to hear is that the PC is dead, which of course is not true, and reports of the death of Firefox are greatly exaggerated as well.

3 Pages1 2 3