Ramblings of an old Doc
Published on September 22, 2013 By DrJBHL In Personal Computing

 

Sounds crazy, right? Except it isn’t.

As you might have heard, Firefox plans to block all third party cookies, which will drastically decrease the ability to track your browsing habits. That’s ok. Up until now, it’s been up to the user to do that or not. Some cookies are better/more functional than others. Those which help websites load faster are good.

When those cookies are blocked, what will happen? It won’t change where ads get displayed, but it will change which get displayed since cookies won’t be used (as much) to profile users.

That will make ad prices drop. Guess who doesn’t want that to happen (or if it does, to have a better strategy)? The largest advertising company in the world, that’s who: Google. Sooo…plan B.

Why not tie an anonymous identifier to Chrome? Then, sell the key to companies and advertisers yet still control the system, at a price. Your browser has just become your tracker. The NSA might already be doing that, and if not, will be.

Cookies shmookies. They didn’t tell you much. The browser? It will tell you everything. Google might play nicely and let you change the numbers in the identifier, or create a different ‘identity’.

Me? I’m heading to Firefox if Google does this.

I think they’re crazy…because if they do this to Chrome, what’s to say they won’t (or haven’t) do/done it to the Android OS? I think that would be close to corporate suicide.

But then, most will probably say, “meh” and buy stock.

Source:

http://www.ghacks.net/2013/09/20/google-chrome-potential-target-googles-post-cookies-plan/?_m=3n%2e0038%2e1010%2ehj0ao01hy5%2e11gd


Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Sep 22, 2013

Just when you think you got the problem licked it comes back to bite you in the tush, go figure. I still have the installer for FF v24 just in case.

on Sep 22, 2013

I would say that Google has been tracking you anyway, if you don't wan't to be watched don't use Chrome (or other Google products).

Android is a bit different it's open source, people would know ... 

on Sep 22, 2013

tazgecko
Android is a bit different it's open source, people would know ...
Except we apparently don´t, so..... who knows ?

on Sep 23, 2013

There is no privacy, they can link everything to your IP address.

on Sep 23, 2013

Interesting!


If google decides to sell this theoretical browser identifier, it will still mean an increase in the cost of ads (just not for google). It seems like quite a clever way to take control of the third party cookie networks. But it would only work for people using Chrome - so it does indeed seem like a very good reason to ditch Chrome and head over to Firefox.

on Sep 23, 2013

I have no choice but to run Chrome on one of the computers in the house. The APU just can't handle processing with any other browser. And it's dual core. Low end AMD at its best I guess. Even IE has issues.

on Sep 24, 2013

FF + Albine + Don't remember history + Startpage search engine.

Best security ever.

EDIT:

kona0197

I have no choice but to run Chrome on one of the computers in the house. The APU just can't handle processing with any other browser. And it's dual core. Low end AMD at its best I guess. Even IE has issues.

Palemoon

FF minus 90% of the useless junk code.

on Sep 24, 2013

I have Pale Moon installed. It has the same issues. 

on Sep 24, 2013

I'll stop surfing the web and smash my pc to little bits before I EVER use FF again. Biggest POS memory leaking crap I've ever used, regardless of version. 

on Sep 24, 2013

I'm going to have to agree with Phoon on that one. Firefox still has a huge memory leak problem.

on Sep 25, 2013

No memory leak issues with Pale Moon in my experience (at least not yet).  On XP or Win7.

on Sep 25, 2013

Try using Pale Moon with a 1.4 GHz CPU. You will see a difference. 

on Sep 25, 2013

So it jumps a couple dozen Kb a second, that's what I have 32 gigs for, so crappy programming isn't a bother.

on Sep 25, 2013

... heard of... google account? they could always shift everything server side.

on Sep 25, 2013

kona0197

Try using Pale Moon with a 1.4 GHz CPU. You will see a difference. 

1.6 Ghz PC at home.

One core too, and no issues.

2 Pages1 2