They have different processors so the same apps generally would not have run anyway without a recompile for the new cpu target so sharing the same name might have caused some degree of confusion.

Having said that I would like for them to open WinRT up to allowing 3rd party desktop applications even if it requires the user to manually ok apps in some way, or enable that option in settings somewhere.

Stardock get the occasional support mail asking if <insert app here> works on Windows RT so even the different name has not avoided confusing people as they see the same Win8 start screen.

Neil... you know I take your word as authoritative. Could what this Clrokr be telling the truth?

They will be 99% the same yes, but compiled to a different cpu target.

It is possible there may be some small tweaks for the platform or areas Microsoft opted not to port (if they had lots of ASM in them - pre DX 10 may be missing for example), but basically WinRT and Win8 will share a code base.  To do otherwise would be silly.

By preventing third party desktop applications they also force people into selling via the store only which gets them a 30% cut.  Was that the primary reason, possibly not, as I imagine the desire to avoid virus problems was pretty high on the list too.

Neil Banfield for Secretary of State.  You are way too much a gentleman.

(I know you can't be - it was a figure of speech)

ALl versions of XP, Vista and 7 had the same code - just different options turned on.  That is what is happening here.  I would much prefer 7 on a tablet.  And I hate the store.  But as the tablet was a gift, I am stuck with it.