Ramblings of an old Doc
Published on June 1, 2012 By DrJBHL In WinCustomize News

 

While reporting the disturbing articles about MS taking the legacy code for the Start Menu I asked folks to post whether Start 8 would be affected.

Tim Shiesser posted at Neowin.net that Start 8, ViStart and Classic Shell were not affected by this action as Neil and Jafo confirmed, yesterday in Forums.

Mr. Shiesser went on to write however,

“They probably won't work come the RTM version of Windows 8, but for now you can still enjoy the combination of new and legacy Windows features.”

He didn’t elaborate what that’s based on, however.

While I hope he’s wrong, this (for me) would be another reason to wait regarding putting Windows 8 on my machine.

Some other news regarding Windows 8 upgrade path:

“If you buy an eligible Windows 7 computer between June 2, 2012, and January 31, 2013, you'll be able to purchase an upgrade to Windows 8 Pro for $14.99.

Microsoft said that more details on the upgrade plan would be announced tomorrow [6.1.2012], and that further upgrade options will be revealed for current Windows 7 computer owners in the coming months.” – c|net

Exactly what comprises “…an eligible Windows 7 computer…” hasn’t been made clear yet. It might only mean an MS Certified W7 computer, however it might also mean some deal with OEM’s has been reached regarding which Windows 8 restrictions will be enacted. More news might be coming today.

That $15 isn't a lot, but it's more than MS charged in the past. It also begs the question, "Why would anyone without a touch screen upgrade to Windows 8?".

Sources:

http://www.neowin.net/news/start-menu-apps-still-work-in-windows-8-release-preview

http://news.cnet.com/8301-10805_3-57444689-75/microsoft-reveals-windows-8-upgrade-path-and-$15-fee/


Comments
on Jun 01, 2012

I do follow the update news on win8 all the time. I also appreciate the updates you give but they only make me continue to use win7. I have my customization the way I like it and see no reason to take a step backword at least in my case.

how anyone that has a large monitor 20" or above would want fingerprints all over it is beyond me. I get a little smudge on my monitor and have to clean it. The bottom line is to each their own and maybe for some it's what they are looking for, but it's just not what I want.

on Jun 01, 2012

Dave... W8 isn't for me, even though mine is a touch screen.... certainly not at this point. Why anyone with a desktop without a touch screen would want W8 is beyond me.

About the finger print issue take a look here: This is an amazing piece of technology: https://forums.wincustomize.com/425914

 

on Jun 01, 2012

Those with and without a touch screen can use the Leap. No smudges.

on Jun 01, 2012

Doc, they use them on all the news channels around here. Weather maps etc. and never touch the screen.

on Jun 01, 2012

Could also be Kinect, Dave. Anyway... $70 won't kill anyone, but again, why? I'm not impressed with W8.

on Jun 02, 2012

Those with and without a touch screen can use the Leap. No smudges.

 

Indeed. I am much more excited about the Leap than I am Windows 8.  Leap has the potential to transform ALL of existing desktop computing, not just small touch screen devices.

on Jun 02, 2012

Excalpius

Those with and without a touch screen can use the Leap. No smudges.

 

Indeed. I am much more excited about the Leap than I am Windows 8.  Leap has the potential to transform ALL of existing desktop computing, not just small touch screen devices.

on Jun 04, 2012

As i am sitting in my luxury CEO type rocker chair with my keyboard on my lap, quite a distance away from large monitors, i totally fail to see how W8 could possibly even come close to the easy of interacting with my computer, let alone surpass it.

 

Even at 14.95$ it's way overpriced. As a resource hog i'm not going to put it on any tablet which runs fine with Android and is fully capable.

Those who believe they can put W8 on a tablet and run Windows applications have not fully understood how x86 application don't port well to ARM.

So in the end, you have a cripple desktop since it's interface is touch oriented and therefore unusable in normal everyday use and you have  a crippled tablet because nothing runs on it that you paid for already to use on your desktop and will never will run due to the vast platform discrepancies.

Meaning you are seriously out of pocket for a touch capable desktop that you actually can use  (without getting various phsyical issues such as eyestrain, neckcramp, shouldercramp, tired arms) a tablet that can comnfortably run W8 and all new software in order to do exactly the same things you can do now.

Please explain to me the logic that makes people even consider going this route?

on Jun 05, 2012

petrossa
As i am sitting in my luxury CEO type rocker chair with my keyboard on my lap, quite a distance away from large monitors, i totally fail to see how W8 could possibly even come close to the easy of interacting with my computer, let alone surpass it.

 

Even at 14.95$ it's way overpriced. As a resource hog i'm not going to put it on any tablet which runs fine with Android and is fully capable.

Those who believe they can put W8 on a tablet and run Windows applications have not fully understood how x86 application don't port well to ARM.

So in the end, you have a cripple desktop since it's interface is touch oriented and therefore unusable in normal everyday use and you have  a crippled tablet because nothing runs on it that you paid for already to use on your desktop and will never will run due to the vast platform discrepancies.

Meaning you are seriously out of pocket for a touch capable desktop that you actually can use  (without getting various phsyical issues such as eyestrain, neckcramp, shouldercramp, tired arms) a tablet that can comnfortably run W8 and all new software in order to do exactly the same things you can do now.

Please explain to me the logic that makes people even consider going this route?

 

It's new.  Duh.

on Jun 06, 2012

  It's new.  Duh.

Talk about consumerism.