TY, Eternal and petrossa, there isn't a need to do some grand "travel to the stars" plan--we have plenty we can do right here (like I mentioned above)--but the longer its put off and neglected, the harder it will be if it has to suddenly be done.

Just like you save money to pay your rent, we should be saving to invest in space--or making small steady investments to get there.

NASA and the ESA as well have all been focused on exploration and pure science.  We are actually at a techniological point where the emphasis should shift to development.

Right now, the driving economic growth industry globally has been computer/web related tech.  It's a big part of why world economies didn't tail spin into an immediate depression.

It's simple--if opening up virtual space created trillions of dollars in new wealth what the heck would happen if we opened space commerce?  I'm not referring to exploration and science--I mean open it for business and manufacturing.

Look what happened with railroads, steamships, the automobile, the opening of the West in the US--the economies boomed and development surged for decades.

The biggest change we need right now is to stop talking about space like science fiction and start talking about it like practical  opportunity.

The worst case scenario is we keep running about in crisis management and deferring long term planning and get to the point where someone gets "put in charge of everything" out of global desperation.

Then you'll get a chance to see corrupt government and the lust for power on steroids.  One man/group will then run the world for everyone and it won't be pretty.

Not going too off topic here but.................

CRACKERS IN SPACE!

http://www.space.com/11508-shuttle-launch-satellite-chips-endeavour.html

Indeed. It'd be the right way to prep ourselves for meeting 'others', too.

Sometimes I wonder if the interstellar distances were planned to be what they are to allow us, and anyone else, to develop spiritually enough to "lose the cave" and become caring creatures. 

Don't hold your breath. We are completely controlled by an ancient brainstructure which we have in common with all mammals. That brainstructure can't evolve away becasue it's the structure that handles all our daily environmental interactions. It has primary control over and access to our senses, memory, body.

Since that brainstructure is hardwired to behave as it does, that'll never change till we find a way to genetically take it out. However since that brainstructure causes what people call 'emotions' that maybe for some a bit hard to give up.

 

The limbic system perceives danger, it prepares the body for the fight/flight response and the neocortex takes this up afterwards due to a complicated interpretative analyses of facial expression (the limbic system has control over that), body stance, muscle tension, heart rate, respiration,hormone levels and lastly visual and auditory clues.

In most cases where immediate action is deemed necessary by the limbic system it performs the required action, leaving the neocortex to figure out why the body landed a blow in someones face.

This gives rise to the thesis that ‘our’ consciousness is just along for the ride. Although ‘we’ can plan and act accordingly, when it comes to real-time environmental interaction its our other consciousness which calls the shots.

This has far reaching consequences for the premise of ‘free will’. Who has the free will, which consciousness we hold accountable. Or do we just hold the one accountable which can make itself heard even though in reality that consciousness actually hasn’t a clue why his body did what it did and has to concoct an explanation itself.

It also places emotions. Emotions are not ‘our’ emotions but the expression of the state of the other consciousness which for lack of further interaction the neocortex also has to determine via interpretative analysis.

I won't lose hope... after all, if we were hardwired and not capable of change, evolution (which can't be thwarted) would not hold true.

What was, is and ever shall be - stands in opposition to what we observe in nature (past and present) and against what we observe in the structure of the brain itself as we learn. 

Evolution is often mistaken for change. Evolution is the refining of existing parts. The limbic system will not evolve anymore, nor the brainstem. It's done, locked in place. The neo-cortex was the next step. That is still in development but ON TOP of the old systems. So sure, evolution goes on, but what works doesn't get reinvented. That's not evolution.

Click on my icon, on my blog i've written a piece explaining the system. Under Free will.

The alternative is that we actually are extraterrestrials--extra-dimensional in fact--only residing here as we are as an expression of our actual nature and not the definition of it...just as some quantum scientists now theorize that gravity may be simply the effect and not the substance of another universe/dimension juxtaposed over our own.

This may be an embryonic stage of development for us and nothing like what we will be or even are at our core. So it may be that what we now think of as only "spiritual" insights are more "scientific" than we are currently able to imagine. Perhaps rather than we are only limited to brain chemistry and instinctive responses we actually are capable of much more and its the chemistry and brain responses that keep us from seeing it clearly.

The universe is full of possibilities and that's why it would be a shame to simply "wink out" and never get to see them.

And my new avatar rocks!

Or, if we ar egoing to wax metaphysical anyway:

To my mind one views things backwards. Anthropocentric. We exist, therefore everything around must exist for us. The (in)famous Goldilocks Zone for example. Objectively such a zone doesn’t exist. It is to us because we are there. Other lifeforms most likely exist in other configurations and are out there looking for their ‘Goldilocks Zones’ and skipping ours because it’s not like theirs.

Things happen because they happen. In such a vast, most likely multiple, universe happenstance is more then enough to explain us. And anything remotely like us elsewhere. In an infinite, or next to, flow of random energy there is no limit to what could form.

We are by nature inflicted by a brain that forms patterns from events, if they exist or not is irrelevant to it. Due to our lack of capacity to comprehend the vast scale of it all we start to see patterns were they are not. To us everything gripping together like clockwork on the macroscopic scale is practically proof it’s all meant to be.

As soon as we take the microscopic events into account things become a whole lot less evident. Particles being just random clumps of energy, changing into one and another on the go is to me a distinct indication it’s all fleeting happenstance we observe. We just lack the timescale, timespan, to see it is just a minute coming together of events which will be gone in the next fleeting instant.

Only chance can fully explain all. Only out of nothing can come something. Anything else lands you in a neverending tree of answers raising more questions then they answer.

Hah! Beat that for floaty talk.  

No and yes. 'Refining' is change. Not all evolution is structural or chemical. Evolution can be emotional and societal... Macro, not micro, and cumulative.

Petrossa, there's nothing metaphysical about considering that we might be part of a multidimensional reality--that's what "reality" is.

Alright...here's the breakdown.

Primary importance is terrestrial infrastructure and redevelopment toward sustainability.  If that isn't done right AND done fast, no other projects will matter anyway, we'll be effectively extinct by the end of the century.  We have half a century's worth of fossil fuels left at best, and we should've weened ourselves off them decades ago.  Now we have to hurry or billions will die of starvation, disease, violence, and worse.  These efforts include, above all, education.  We have to teach ourselves how to think and view things in new and more sustainable ways.

Secondary importance is development of our local space, such as Earth orbit, Lunar orbit, and the Lunar surface.  It is from those places that all other missions must be begun if they are to have any reasonable chance of success.  Likewise, Lunar resources and orbital Solar power would be immeasurably valuable in meeting our growing needs (even after they've been curbed to more reasonable levels).  Orbital elevators (if viable) would be invaluable to that end, being that such a development would do more for inexpensive and rapid orbital and Lunar development than all of the world's efforts to date combined.  After that, it is necessary to develop each world and its space that we explore as a stepping stone to the next world.  Each stage of this development will always take a back seat to the need to maintain the stability of Earth's ecosystems, resources, and our society in general (especially for those members of the society existing on other worlds).

Tertiary importance is pure research for its own sake.  This must never be abandoned because it is the engine by which we innovate and leap forward to new ideas and possibilities.  It was pure research that showed us what space could mean for us in the first place.  But it must take a back seat to the other two because if we don't survive, and if we don't support our exploration correctly, the research will amount to nothing, for what little progress it ever makes.

Now...all that said, I am firmly against the incorporation of ANY of these efforts.  Corporations cannot be trusted with such important tasks, especially with the utter lack of regulation and enforcement of those few paltry regulations.  As it is, letting corporations take over the space race is inviting disaster.  They will sacrifice safety to cut costs, they will ignore science to boost profits, and they will have full say in who and what can or cannot go into space which will always be prioritized to whatever maximizes their profits no matter the consequences.  This cannot be permitted, and must be prevented at any cost.  I'm not particularly trusting of the government either, but for the time being they seem to be much easier to keep in check than corporations.  Either way, something has to be done about both, I suppose.

Education as a whole though Tharios seems to be the red headed step child that keeps on getting beaten to a pulp by every state. States keep taking away funding from education. When was the last time the government acted on behalf of education as a whole? From my stand point over the past few years education has suffered more and more due to funding being taken away and allocating it to other places where it isn't needed.

And our country says the youth is the future of the country, of the world and yet we keep screwing the youth over by not providing the very best of education has to offer except for those people who are rich enough to send their children to private schools.

Though I'm not really trusting of the government myself I really think instead of states running the show when it comes to schooling and education that the federal government of the US should be running education in all states and they have full say. Of course for this to happen you need a majority on this and of course you need the right people for this.

Agenda 21 makes for an interesting read: http://www.un.org/esa/dsd/agenda21/index.shtml

Rio Declaration: http://www.un.org/documents/ga/conf151/aconf15126-1annex1.htm

Of particular note Principle 8: "To achieve sustainable development and a higher quality of life for all people, States should reduce and eliminate unsustainable patterns of production and consumption and promote appropriate demographic policies."

Is Agenda 21 already in action or were these just idle words?

My point: we aren't truly going anywhere in space until sustainable development is attained here first.

Compare it to a computer. Because although cliche that's what the brain is.

You have hardware and software. The locked down structures are the hardware, the high order processes are software.

Emotions are the expression of the state of mind of the locked down brain structures. As such they are part of the OS if you will.

The higher order processes are in that analogy the software which runs on the OS. The software can do what it wants, but limited to and influence by the restraints of the OS.

The higher order processes interpret the expressions of the locked down braibn structure. It can interpret them freely, but only as an extension of the basic. One can make oneself 'feel' in a certain way be callling the brain API and make a functioncall: Be sad.

You'll feel sad. Good Actors do that for example.

They don't create the emotion, they just call up an emotion.

So any refining of emotion can only be done be calling up the emotion, and expressing it outwards in a different way. One can not create an emotion.

It doesn't help when states like CA and IL get only 70 cents out of every federal dollar they give in taxes, whereas States like MS get twice what they put in.