Ramblings of an old Doc

 

 

This non-invasive technology using extremely small nanoparticles embedded in the contact lens was developed by Chemical and Biochemical Engineering professor Jin Zhang at The University of Western Ontario.

These engineered nanoparticles react with glucose molecules found in tears, causing a chemical reaction that changes their color. The obvious limitations are how the person ‘sees’ colors and that diabetes damages the eye’s natural lens and nerve layer (the retina), so it might not be useful for all diabetics. It’s still in development and hasn’t reached human testing stages yet.

                     

Contact-lens scientist Babak Parviz at the University of Washington has developed a smart lens that measures the blood sugar levels of people with diabetes, by checking sugar levels in tears electronically. His lens has an intricate manufacturing needs an RF power source near it at this point though, and tests haven’t been done to see possible problems between it and the eye.

             

                                                                        not the actual lens

Multifunctional electronic contact lenses would possess medical abilities to monitor glucose, cholesterol, sodium, and potassium levels of the user, sending data to medical personnel for analysis through wireless data transmitters. That means all those blood tests and needle fears could be done with also, eventually. They might eventually gain vision expanding or even gaming possibilities.

These technologies have vast potential applications beyond biomedical devices, including for food packaging. For example, nanocomposite films can prevent food spoilage by preventing oxygen, carbon dioxide and moisture from reaching fresh meats and other foods, or by measuring pathogenic contamination; others can make packaging increasingly biodegradable.

 

 

Source: http://www.nano.org.uk/news/index.php?article=319

           http://tinyurl.com/yygdwp7

           http://tinyurl.com/l4ukfy

           http://tinyurl.com/4g3dzg2


Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Feb 07, 2011

Beats the finger stick!  But I had problems wearing contact lenses (before I got Lasik) so I guess I will go the finger stick route should I ever develop the disease.

Thanks for the info tho!

on Feb 07, 2011

Thats neat, I have many Diabetics in my family, my mom and uncle are both type 1.

on Feb 07, 2011

These developments are not available just yet... will require safety testing (especially the option with the microcircuitry) as heat is liberated from the circuits and they are very close to the Cornea (clear layer of the eye).

@Lord Xia - please send the link to this article as well as the following one especially relevant for Type I Diabetics:  http://tinyurl.com/48nwlc4


on Feb 07, 2011

Whoa, nice article Doc! Just happens I have an eye appt. on the 8th. Gotta keep an eye out for glaucoma.....no pun intended.

My pressure is a tad high, the doctor says, so we're watching it carefully.  Diabetes sucks, you know.

on Feb 07, 2011

Something for me to keep track of for sure.

I have a Diabetic eye exam this afternoon.

on Feb 07, 2011

If folks are interested in these types of tech solutions and developments, please let me know!

on Feb 07, 2011

DrJBHL
If folks are interested in these types of tech solutions and developments, please let me know!

Doc - if it is Tech, you betcha!  Besides, anyone in the Tech field all of a sudden becomes the "goto guy" for family when they have questions.  More often than not, I have no Idea what they are talking about, but I know how to find out.

on Feb 07, 2011

but I know how to find out.

That's the key. Hello! You're all connected to the internet! Look it up!

I'm talking about really radical developments in Biotech, for example.

on Feb 07, 2011
"surgical" cure to suicidal depression..... being tried in the US with about 70% success rate.... news here in Oz [Royal Melbourne] is 5 out of 5 ....100% - so far...
on Feb 07, 2011

on Feb 07, 2011

Not a good option for those with Sjogrens.

But it is another excellent money maker...potentially.

The FDA would first have to make the company pay the Feds for clinical trials, and when or if it passes (~10 yrs), perhaps ....just perhaps...., genetic engineering will have advanced to the point where babies would be born diabetes-free (and free from other diseases...possibly).

Wait...what am I saying?  Such advancements would only cripple the industry.

Peer-reviewed.

Evidenced-based.

Peer-reviewed.

Why not break the mold?

..... 'Cuz it works.'

-.-

on Feb 07, 2011

Why not break the mold?

..... 'Cuz it works.'

Why not? Because that's the way we examine if it works, how well it works and what problems exist with it.

"'Cuz it works" - sounds anti-intellectual and tautological. Definitely not the way to progress.

"Why is the sky blue?" - 1. Because of the dust reflecting and refracting the light passing through the atmosphere altering the pure black of space.

                                   2. Because.

The person receiving answer 2 gets the short end of the stick, don't you think?

on Feb 08, 2011

W00t! I go to UW! You are welcome. 

on Feb 08, 2011

All these advancements are all well and good...unfortunately the way things are going with our wealth...uh...I mean...healthcare system they will only be available for the rich or privileged.

on Feb 08, 2011

^ I had hoped things would have changed with respect to that, but then reality happened.

2 Pages1 2