Ramblings of an old Doc
Published on December 20, 2015 By DrJBHL In Personal Computing

 

“CISA was meant to allow companies to share information on cyber attacks — including data from private citizens — with other companies and the Department of Homeland Security. Once DHS had all the pertinent details, they could be passed along to the FBI and NSA for further investigation and, potentially, legal action. The thing is, critics saw the bill as way for government agencies to more easily keep tabs on Americans without their knowledge.” – engadget

And yeah, all the big tech companies tried to point it all out…this time, to no avail.

So the fake cybersecurity actual surveillance bill passed and was signed, no problemo.

Why? Because the folks who hate the Fourth Amendment like anathema found the perfect way to sneak it through: The Omnibus Budget Act. Two thousand pages pages which they had two days to read (as usual).

“ ... if anything, the version of CISA that was quietly slipped into this budget plays with privacy even faster and looser than the original. For one, a previously held prohibition against sharing information with the NSA has been removed, meaning America's best surveillance agency can receive pertinent data without it being handled by Homeland Security first. More importantly, the provision that required personal information to be scrubbed from cybersecurity reports also seems to have gone missing, leaving that task up to the discretion of which ever agency gets their hands on it.” – ibid

What really bothers me is that the same folks who determined that you or I lying to Federal investigators is a felony, but for them…business as usual.

Ah, what does it matter? People don’t seem to be able to give away their rights fast enough.

This, from Yale (where a President and Secretary of State went to school):

“Here is some depressing news out of Yale University. A majority of students favor restricting free speech on campus.” – CaffeinatedThoughts 

But far worse:

“To put some numbers behind that perception, The William F. Buckley Jr. Program at Yale recently commissioned a survey from McLaughlin & Associates about attitudes towards free speech on campus. Some 800 students at a variety of colleges across the country were surveyed. The results, though not surprising, are nevertheless alarming. By a margin of 51 percent to 36 percent, students favor their school having speech codes to regulate speech for students and faculty. Sixty-three percent favor requiring professors to employ “trigger warnings” to alert students to material that might be discomfiting. One-third of the students polled could not identify the First Amendment as the part of the Constitution that dealt with free speech. Thirty-five percent said that the First Amendment does not protect “hate speech,” while 30 percent of self-identified liberal students say the First Amendment is outdated.” – Wall Street Journal

This is frightening. One third could not identify the First Amendment as part of the Constitution? And 30% of self defined liberal students said it’s outdated? I don’t care about the “liberal” part, and neither should you. I care that one third couldn’t identify the First Amendment as part of the Constitution…and then, the rest of these depressing statistics.

Is it any surprise that the social media generation doesn’t know squat about privacy? No.

Is it a surprise the degree to which they live in a country for which so many have died for those rights, yet they couldn’t be bothered to learn the basis of their history, historical documents and national holidays and yet receive a high school diploma and be accepted into a college/University? Yes.

This post is about the loss of freedoms through apathy and ignorance, not about politics, and I want it kept that way.

Sources:

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20151218/15571633126/want-to-know-how-ridiculous-omnibus-bill-is-it-has-meaningless-porn-filter-clause-four-times.shtml

https://caffeinatedthoughts.com/2015/10/yale-students-the-first-amendment-is-outdated/

http://www.wsj.com/articles/notable-quotable-unfree-speech-on-campus-1445555707


Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Dec 20, 2015

ElanaAhova

Public Education (in the U$A) traditionally has been influenced by two different philosophies.  Earlier in our history, (think one room school house) education had a strong ethical and community focus.  Yes, reading, writing, and cyphering were basic.  But so was learning about civics - and participating in the town meetings.  Later in our history, starting (perhaps) in the New England mill towns, business interests began pushing the need for workers that were complient, punctual, and could read and write just enogh to follow directions and operate the ever more complicated machines. Assembly line education evolved.  Today, public education is all about training to get a job - mouldling students on the educational assembly line.  These two streams (training to be a particiaptory citizen / training to be a 'good' worker) are the heritage of modern public education.  Guess which one predominates today (cf. Dewey)? 

When I went to school in the 50's and 60's it was about history, geography and civics.... about skills and knowledge that could help better our lives, and not just about joining the workforce and being commercially productive.  Sure, we also had woodwork, metalwork and cookery classes, and while they useful for industrial purposes later on, they were taught more on a personal, hobby-like level and fun to participate in.   The focus was more on personal development back then, whereas now it does seem to be focused more on career and productivity.... the GDP, and sadly, this form of 'education' is producing mindless drones who think little of anything beyond career.... especially of their civil rights and responsibilities

The thing is, who is responsible for this sad state of affairs?  The parents for driving their kids to 'higher' education... the desired result being well paid careers?  Or is it corporations, who invest in higher educational institutions and need to see future executives/employees evolve through structured learning?  Or would it be government, who thinks it can best manage the large undertaking of creating a 'one-size-fits-all' program?

Sadly, It doesn't matter whose fault it is. all are responsible and our kids have lost their sense of 'self'.  This is why they too easily accept whatever government says, be it right or wrong.... whether or not their individual rights are lost.  Those aren't important anymore because the emphasis of higher learning is about career and salary.  And sadly, this is true not only in the US, but of many Western [industrialised] countries.... Australia included.  Not only does it breed apathy, but also anarchy, as kids these days push the boundaries in a desperate bid to express themselves without the necessary skills of 'self'.  That's why we're seeing the rise of gangs and gang violence... because the 'personal touch' was lost in education when we as parents and leaders lost touch with our childrens true needs of self-awareness and belonging without being absorbed.

Another pertinent point!  How many kids are in child care or return home to an empty house because the parents are working, often long hours and not getting home until 7.00pm  or even later?  There are two problems arising from this!  One is that quality time between parents and their children is diminished and there's much less  interaction regarding important social issues.... and we must remember, education begins at home.  The other issue is children being left to their own devices too long... and we all know the old saying about the devil and idle [unsupervised] hands.

In essence, then, the question should really be, are we too busy with work and career to notice those events going on around us and what are children are up to/learning?   And are we too tired or consumed with our leisure time to take a stand... even care/or notice that human/civil rights are being eroded?

Put bluntly, we essentially molded society the way we want it., thus we are products of our own making.

on Dec 21, 2015

We are all products of our environments. That's what makes us what, rather than who, we are. Just look at the inner cities where many live at or below poverty levels. You don't see that in many, so called, affluent neighborhoods.

on Dec 21, 2015


We are all products of our environments. That's what makes us what, rather than who, we are. Just look at the inner cities where many live at or below poverty levels. You don't see that in many, so called, affluent neighborhoods.

True, there is much poverty in cities right around the world, but people are not necessarily defined by it.  People who fight to maintain their sense of self worth and belief, their rights and a sense of belonging tend to hold their heads higher with dignity and rise above it.  Now this is not to say I excuse the haves for their affluence and excesses, because in my opinion they have much to answer for.... greed, corruption, withholding, a lack of care and compassion for fellow man.

Trouble is, we, the common man allowed them to amass fortunes and power.  Why?  Because too many of us gave up fighting and just said: "WTF can I do about it?"

Like I said, we are the products of our own making.  And do we have justice anymore?  Or is what we have the desire of the corporate world, where the almighty buck speaks volumes and we peons are subjugates of that higher way of thinking?  I mean, is it justice that recording and movie studios can take grannies for their retirement funds because a grandchild distracted her while another illegally downloaded a song or movie?   Where is the feching justice in that, pray tell?

More importantly, how/why did we let it come to this, where the most powerful can prey on the most vulnerable and least able to defend themselves?  Apathy comes to mind, as do piss poor attitudes and a complete lack of care.... by governments and on BOTH sides of the socio-economic divide.

on Dec 21, 2015

Universities are not places of knowledge anymore,

on Dec 21, 2015

sureshot106

Universities are not places of knowledge anymore.

 

Not universities so much as assembly lines to train people how to succeed in business (making everyone else a product and/or a consumer). 

 

*edited by Moderation.

on Dec 21, 2015

Thanks, sureshot106.

on Dec 21, 2015

??  Seems those are follow-ons about education.  What did I miss?

2 Pages1 2