Ramblings of an old Doc

 

David J. Slater is the photographer who set up a monkey selfie shot (in 2011) and when it became a meme, requested Wikipedia to remove the monkey selfie with a DCMA letter. Wiki said, sorry but the photo is uncopyrightable since current law says

“The term ‘authorship’ implies that, for a work to be copyrightable, it must owe its origin to a human being. Materials produced solely by nature, by plants, or by animals are not copyrightable.” – Copyright Compendium 202.02 b and c

So…the pics were obviously in the public domain…since even though he set up the picture, the monkey pushed the button.

But now? “PETA Strikes Back”, or rather, “Naruto Strikes Back”. They say his name is Naruto. Their lawyers actually filed (where else? San Francisco) a brief {irony: Check Sources number 2} defending the lawsuit which the lawyers actually claim is legit (in my eyes, the lawyers have ceased to be legit). You can see it here. It boils down to “Well, someone has to own it and it should be the monkey.” Lawyers having fun at the public expense. How about the Judge fining them $2 million for their PETA paid for publicity stunt? Never mind that Slater has been changing his story to expand his role in the idiotic photo. But the thought “There has to be a copyright and someone must hold it” is also wrong. The law actually says that photos/art created by humans or animals can be in the public domain and that therefore no one owns them.

Enough of this battle to entitle animals to stuff they aren’t entitled to from the get go. They have a right to some dignity, after all. What self respecting monkey, or other animal for that matter, would want to be a paparazzo?

How about this: Leave the animals alone where they live. Don’t destroy their environment: No amount of cosmetics justify destroying the world (it isn’t just where THEY live: It’s one planet). Go there and kill only time, and take only pictures (or paint, I don’t care). Then leave. Sell the pictures or not. The animals will have won, and so will we.

Now can we actually: 1) Defeat Daesh (ISIS). 2) Do something good for this mudball. 3) Stop preventing monkeys from being photographers and PLEASE, 4) End the “What Happened to Global Warming?” thread.

Sorry...could't resist the urge. So sue me.

Sources:

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20151204/15044132991/selfie-monkey-strikes-back-lawyers-claim-course-monkeys-can-sue-copyright.shtml

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/2641993/20151204Plaintiff27sOppositiontoMTD.pdf


Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Dec 06, 2015

There's no might about it, Ross, not only a better job but far less bullshit and far fewer lies/broken promises.

As for Annabelle, she should be made Speaker.

on Dec 06, 2015

In my opinion animals have not devolved to the point where they know how to lie.

on Dec 06, 2015

Annabelle died quite quite a few years back, so unless we're going for Speaker for the Dead...

 

Uvah, animals are quite adept at lying.  I had a dog that would shit in the house as revenge for leaving him alone, and then hide the evidence in an attempt to avoid the spanking.  He'd drag around things like rugs, newspapers, covering his mess up before you got back.  The little bastard was a real pain in the ass but when it was too cold to leave him outside, it was too cold.

 

My dad had a dog that was even smarter when he was a kid, he'd clean the tops off with his paws, looking for a good sized carrot, yank the sucker out, clean it, eat it, and dispose of the stem.  The kids got blamed for it since it was so obviously a person doing it, no one suspected the dog until he was caught in the act.

on Dec 06, 2015

Don't mistake being vindictive for lying. I have a cat that does the same thing if he doesn't get his own way. In time they get over it.

on Dec 06, 2015

Hiding the evidence of the crime dude, subterfuge.

on Dec 06, 2015


In my opinion animals have not devolved to the point where they know how to lie.

And that's why they'd make better politicians... like you could count on it when they said: "I did not have sexual relations with that woman."

More to the point, they wouldn't con the world into invading Iraq [or anywhere else for that matter] over non-existent weapons of mass destruction.

psychoak

Uvah, animals are quite adept at lying. I had a dog that would shit in the house as revenge for leaving him alone, and then hide the evidence in an attempt to avoid the spanking. He'd drag around things like rugs, newspapers, covering his mess up before you got back. The little bastard was a real pain in the ass but when it was too cold to leave him outside, it was too cold.

There ya go again, blaming the dog for your failure to keep him properly amused.  Yup, it was your fault he had to resort to playing practical jokes to amuse himself.  He hid those turds deliberately, orright, but not to avoid a "spanking".  No, he did it in the hope you'd step on one and feel the squelch of it spreading under-foot.  You never saw or heard it, but he was laughing like Muttley on the inside.

 

on Dec 07, 2015

starkers
Oh, and Cauldyth, do you hold the copyright for the selfie that is your avatar?

I'd be proud to be a monkey.  Apes are overrated.

 

on Dec 07, 2015

psychoak

Hiding the evidence of the crime dude, subterfuge.

Separation anxiety can manifest itself in different ways. It isn't a deliberate lie, like saying no I did not when, in fact, I did. The dog must have experienced 'the spanking' and is trying to avoid it. Animals learn by rote. A repeated episode is not forgotten and the response is a primal one. Avoid the hurt.

on Dec 07, 2015


In my opinion animals have not devolved to the point where they know how to lie.

 

actually, some studies have shown several species of simians do practice deception / misdirection - especially when hiding food.  Are deception and/or misdirection forms of lying?

2 Pages1 2