Ramblings of an old Doc

 

Nothing stays the same. If it did, there’d be no word ‘nostalgia’.

So, Terry Myerson (MS’s OS Chief) has just stated, “"We're not going to be delivering all of the updates to all of these consumers on one day of the month," Myerson said of changes to Windows Update under Windows 10.”

Excellent for not just the reason of dreading one day per month. Not all patches are equally important, nor rapidly tested. Why should the patches which are ready sit around on the shelf for some arbitrary day to roll around. That was a ridiculous way to do things to begin with and I (for one) am glad that dinosaur is dying.

But…this has wider implications. Operating Systems. In a way, the W8/8.1 debacle has shown MS that it’s kind of antiquated to roll out a new OS every 3 years.

Like the browsers and their updating, why can’t OSs do the same? W10 Nightly builds? Modulular updating? Why not?

There will be the ‘edgy’ crowd which loves to screw around with their OSs and give MS feedback…and then, there are others who’ll benefit (maybe) from these OS explorer (sorry, but I used ‘edge’ already)/warrior types.

MS is neither confirming nor denying, and will disavow any knowledge of you, Mr. Phelps.

May I suggest to all future users of W10 that they not hasten to update as soon as a patch becomes ‘available’? Might I propose that you wait a bit and see if any friend’s computer has become a paper weight as a result of hasty patch installation? Maybe creating a restore point before any updating?

It should make the Support Forum an even more ‘interesting’ place, anyway.

Have a good weekend!

Source:

http://www.computerworld.com/article/2920181/microsoft-windows/patch-tuesday-may-be-dead-but-microsofts-not-confessing-to-the-crime.html


Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on May 10, 2015

DaveRI


Quoting starkers,

Like I said, muck work needs to be done if Cloud based OSes are to become commonplace..



I'm not sure if that's a typo, a Freudian slip, or an astute observation 

Um, definitely a typo, Dave.... though do believe people will not happily move over to Cloud based OSes until privacy and security concerns are addressed.  Then there are those who can not access a high speed internet fast enough to run a Cloud based OS... plus use online tools AND browse AND download/stream media, etc.  So no, it's not likely to be a reality any time soon....  unless MS again jumps the gun, that is, and releases before the product/market is ready.

 

on May 10, 2015

RedneckDude



Nothing stays the same. If it did, there’d be no word ‘nostalgia’.



Tell that to the XP hangers on....lol.

I run 8.1 on all machines. As for 10, we'll see.

Jim, if you have 8.1 it's a good deal to upgrade to 10 for free, though I wouldn't recommend doing that on day 1.

However, I wouldn't recommend doing that for W7 users. W7 is an eminently stable OS and would use it to the end of its life.

on May 10, 2015

I am running Windows 7, Windows 8.1 and Windows 10 (Triple Boot) right now. My primary OS is Windows 7 though. I just have 10 installed to see what it's like and to see what other nonsense Microsoft comes up with. 

on May 10, 2015

For enterprise networks, it might not be so simple. In reality patches sometimes break things. Unmanaged patching creates headaches for those tasked with ensuring availability of corporate network resources. So companies may opt to create artificial patch cycles so patches can be managed.

on May 10, 2015

eviator

companies may opt to create artificial patch cycles so patches can be managed.

As I wrote in the OP:


May I suggest to all future users of W10 that they not hasten to update as soon as a patch becomes ‘available’? Might I propose that you wait a bit and see if any friend’s computer has become a paper weight as a result of hasty patch installation?

on May 11, 2015

DrJBHL

As I wrote in the OP:


May I suggest to all future users of W10 that they not hasten to update as soon as a patch becomes ‘available’? Might I propose that you wait a bit and see if any friend’s computer has become a paper weight as a result of hasty patch installation?

That's probably wise advice for users of Win 7 and 8/8.1.... Vista, too.  Patches in the past have been known to break things in all OSes, so I download them automatically but install them manually a few days later, just to be on the safe side.  For the most part, patches have been tested and are found to be safe, but given the different configurations of hardware and software across the board, there may be exceptions to the rule.... hence the 'wait and see' approach.

on May 11, 2015

eviator

For enterprise networks, it might not be so simple. In reality patches sometimes break things. Unmanaged patching creates headaches for those tasked with ensuring availability of corporate network resources. So companies may opt to create artificial patch cycles so patches can be managed.

So much THIS.

"Hey nobody can log onto the timecard website today."

"Was Java updated last night?"

"Looks like it."

"There's your problem." 

Everything automatically updating whenever it wants creates huge headaches for IT people.

on May 11, 2015

Automatic anything is no bargain...Murphy's Law is applicable for everything and at every level.

2 Pages1 2