Ramblings of an old Doc

 

Last week I wrote about iOS 8 and the 5th Amendment, the first installment on this topic. I figured it wouldn't take long for the other shoe to drop.

The director of the FBI, James Comey feels that in the ‘post-Snowden’ era, the pendulum of distrust in the government has swung too far. He said that encryption software on smart devices will create a ‘black holes’ in which bad people can operate. He asked the question, “Are we so mistrustful of government and law enforcement that we’re willing to let bad guys walk away?”.

He also suggested the current administration may seek laws to force tech companies to create ‘backdoors’ for law enforcement to use for surveillance.

Unfortunately, ‘backdoors’ aren’t special, magic portals. They’re gaps in software security. They are vulnerable to any hacker, not just to law enforcement.

That’s why MS is patching ‘backdoors’ all the time, especially on ‘Patch Tuesdays’.

Jon Tanguy, senior technical marketing engineer from Micron, a maker of solid-state drives (SSDs) pointed out that not only are hackers smart and able to find backdoors, but any employee of a tech company who'd been involved in encryption deployment would be able to share that information.

Not to worry. Many SSD makers have flatly refused to put ‘backdoors’ into anything because frankly, what’s the point of having AES 256 bit or (coming soon) AES 512 bit encryption if there’s going to be a backdoor which will completely negate that encryption. When AES 512 bit encryption arrives, the government (and every hacker on earth) can fold up shop because it would take a super computer decades to break it.

Using an example, “Good news! We’re giving you a special injection to protect you from Ebola. Bad news: It will mean you have constant colds and influenza and may die broke of another infection or the injection’s side effects.”

Honestly? If you’re dead, you’re dead. Doesn’t matter one iota (to you) what killed you. So, please don’t give me every bug under the sun in order to protect me from one I stand little or no chance of getting.

Oh yes, that question Mr. Comey asked…the answer is yes, and could you please give me a score card so I’ll be able to tell who’s wearing which color hat, today?

Source:

http://www.computerworld.com/article/2835652/once-the-fbi-has-a-backdoor-into-your-smartphone-everyone-does.html


Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Oct 20, 2014

starkers

The politics of fear

Very effective. Keeps the local yokels in check. Focuses their attention elsewhere rather than on those paid to 'protect' their sanctity. Create the monster then show the monster as pure evil. Joe shmoe sees only the evil monster but remains blind to its creator, the very ones who are paid to 'protect' them. Knowledge is a powerful weapon. As long as that knowledge is kept from the masses corruption reigns supreme. Corporate entities control Uncle Sam, not the politicos who ride the desk. Corporate entities are all about money, what it can do and who it can buy. Big money tells the three lettered agencies where to look and at whom. The quote above is their primary weapon and used to great effect. A country under siege? Oh yeah...but from within. Enterovirus #68 is a good example. All those children from South America allowed into the country...among them the virus that has already taken one life. Why did they come here? Easy...to escape the corruption down south ie the drug wars, slavery and what have you. To them...no choice. Ebola...here in three places already. Dallas, Boston and Cleveland. Lazy monitoring has seen to that, mistakes made and other nonsense. 

Ramble ramble.

on Oct 20, 2014

Again...time to remind all....'bill of rights' affects 6% of the global population.

In real life it is meaningless and parochial.  The Internet is global...it is not an American Institution.

Whether or not the proposed intrusions into one's privacy is actually socially or morally wrong....that's the more relevant question....and in our modern times of innocents being publicly beheaded for the sexual gratification of slobbering retards on facebook....who really has a right to give a shit about 'personal privacy'?

on Oct 20, 2014

The question of government agency sponsored (with our money) holes in our security to be exploited has relevancy to some. 

Put the affected hard drives on your machine and by extension, it has relevancy for you as well. It's your choice whether that's meaningful to you or not...others feel differently.

Warrantless or 'rubber stamped' warrants are a severe compromise of 6% of the world's population's (actually as many as use the software/drives) rights as guaranteed by that government.

 

 

on Oct 20, 2014


who really has a right to give a shit about 'personal privacy'?

You, and everyone else.  The fact that 'only 6% of the world's population has a bill of rights' is an indictment of the other 94, not an excuse to not give a shit.

.02, YMMV & all that.

on Oct 20, 2014


You, and everyone else. The fact that 'only 6% of the world's population has a bill of rights' is an indictment of the other 94, not an excuse to not give a shit.
.

Probably half of that 6% are on Facebook and twitter, et al and thus demonstrate they really don't care at all...

on Oct 20, 2014

Jafo, there's a radical difference in what can be accessed by the government in your computer, cloud storage and external drives as well as your email accounts, etc. by having a 'backdoor' which they's never, ever access without a warrant (oh yeah), and a crumby facebook account.

on Oct 20, 2014


Probably half of that 6% are on Facebook and twitter, et al and thus demonstrate they really don't care at all...

Well, there IS that.

2 Pages1 2