Ramblings of an old Doc

 

It’s no coincidence. SOPA, PIPA, the new measure proposed in Australia and now the in the UK a bill has been proposed a bill which would allow officials to view metadata, like the names of files that were transferred, when and to whom messages were sent, and what websites have been accessed, without a warrant, which would be needed to actually view the content itself.

Who could look? Well, pretty much everyone from Law Enforcement to Tax Inspectors. So, there are multiple potentials for abuse – from hackers as well. Great strategy: Instead of multiple, small and well hidden (and protected) targets to one big fat one which some idiot will undoubtedly be unencrypted and protected by the most secure of passwords: 123456. That’s no exaggeration since without doubt, many of the smaller databases will be stored as “plain text”.

Unfortunately, these security minded people will be able to build very detailed maps of communications and friends and if someone gets accused of something (viz. M. Bachmann) even correctly, suspicion will inevitably be cast on innocent people and their lives and reputations will be ruined. Shades of McCarthyism.

What bothers me is that there’s a need for these databases at all. Our leaders are quick to say, “Terrorists could never destroy the principles of the United States.” Would that were true. Seems to me exactly that has happened. Of course, they might have been saying that cynically: That destruction occurred decades before.

So, “The League of Internet Protectors” has come into being (on LinkdIn):

“The Internet Protectors brings together professional experts, knowledgeable individuals, and normal human beings, all of whom are interested in the same thing: a safe online experience that engenders trust and confidence while enabling the full benefits of today's web.”

Great. They’ll “advise” people who aren’t in the least, interested. When did the government ever do that?

“The Internet Defense League” has also been born. Today. These folks are serious. They have a “Cat signal”. Watch for it.

"Together, our websites and personal networks can mobilize the planet to defend the internet from bad laws and monopolies."

OK… that’s it for today.

 

Sources:

http://www.neowin.net/news/the-uk-wants-to-build-a-giant-database-of-internet-usage

http://www.neowin.net/news/internet-defense-league-has-real-world-cat-signals

https://forums.wincustomize.com/428398


Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Jul 21, 2012

the_Monk

Quoting Sinperium, reply 6
We canucks realised long ago that "personal anything" (least of all freedom) was non-existent and fighting the trend or establishment would just prove to be frustrating and futile.  So you know what we did?

We smoked a little......drank a little more (of our beer that doesn't taste like yankee water...hehe) and danced a hell of a lot with our hot canadian women.  You know what?  We're happier than pigs in shit!   

Personal F.......... .... whatever....(or at the least the illusion therof) you can have em!

And I just re-watched the Firefly series.  Sounds like a bunch of Alliance go-se to me.

We all have personal freedom.  We can steal, misbehave and even shoot up a threater and nothing in the 'verse can stop us (yeah, I'm sticking with that Firefly thing).

How we collectively look at the importance of freedoms though is the bigger picture.  Read history and watch what happens to societies that accept the premise that, "the good of the state comes before the good of the individuals that make it up".  It never ends well.

In a society where we all value the individual, we can get behind the law of the state to protect society and even trust it at times to have exceptional powers to deal with the extremes like the guy in Colorado or Al Quaida, etc....because it's run by "people like us".

When the state becomes a person--and a person more important than any others--then we have a reason for concern.  Such a state can redefine freedom on a whim or in an instant.  It's a new divine sovereign and a tyrant at will. People that never dissent or act against such a state are what empowers it--but even resistance has to be balanced by the idea that all individuals are valuable or those who resist are as bad as the state they resist.

Count me out of those throwing up their hands and saying, "Resistance is futile--make yourself comfortable and just don't worry" but also count me out of those who would destroy individuals to resist.

Still, we must resist.

(I saw Canadian Bacon--I'm on to you Canucks...Nathan Fillion excepted).

 

2 Pages1 2