Ramblings of an old Doc

 

Privacy is an important concept. We all want it. We all make sacrifices to keep it, yet paradoxically also do things to compromise it. Ok up to here. However, when we make online purchases, join websites and other things, we expect these details to remain guarded and become angered when these sites, and our data are compromised.

Well, the Administration has a plan to generate standards for online privacy. This isn’t out of line imo. The Internet stretches across states, countries and the world. Arguably beyond it as well, as various companies pursue comsats, etc. That seems to be an area where national governments are justifiably involved.

So what are theses standards?

1. Individual Control: Consumers have a right to exercise control over what personal data companies collect from them and how they use it.

2. Transparency: Consumers have a right to easily understandable and accessible information about privacy and security practices.

3. Respect for Context: Consumers have a right to expect that companies will collect, use, and disclose personal data in ways that are consistent with the context in which consumers provide the data.

4. Security: Consumers have a right to secure and responsible handling of personal data.

5. Access and Accuracy: Consumers have a right to access and correct personal data in usable formats, in a manner that is appropriate to the sensitivity of the data and the risk of adverse consequences to consumers if the data is inaccurate.

6. Focused Collection: Consumers have a right to reasonable limits on the personal data that companies collect and retain.

7. Accountability: Consumers have a right to have personal data handled by companies with appropriate measures in place to assure they adhere to the Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights.

These also seem pretty good on the face of it. I’d suggest reading more about these “Rights” here: http://money.cnn.com/2012/02/22/technology/bill_of_rights_privacy/index.htm

There are fuzzy areas, but they can (and will) be refined. Oh yes, by the same folks who brought you ACTA,PIPA and SOPA. Thing is, data mining will continue (good, honest work, that), and that leads me to the next item.

“In Private” settings on Internet Explorer and similar on other browsers aren’t.

“In Private” means just what it says. It means you do not wish to be tracked. By anyone. It’s creepy (and I don’t care who says it’s “anonymous”: I don’t believe him). The claims of the data miners are that it isn’t personal. It’s just business. My business, your business and none of theirs. I don’t choose to believe them when they say it’s anonymous. I don’t choose to believe the cell companies when they say those apps are only there to monitor dropped calls to improve service.

So, it turns out despite your implicit demand for privacy by choosing “In Private” browsing, Google has found a way around that. But they don’t want to pry. They’ve found a way around the privacy setting in Internet Explorer and in Safari. I won’t bother discussing Chrome’s “Incognito” mode for obvious reasons. Incognito? Probably anything but.

Now we come to their latest and greatest: Their March 1st change in “privacy policy”. They intend to share your info across all their “products”:

“If you have a Google account (for, say, Gmail) and have not specifically located and paused the Web History setting, then the search giant is keeping track of your searches and the sites you visited. This data has been separated from other Google products, but on March 1 it will be shared across all of the Google products you use when Google's new privacy policy goes into effect.” – http://howto.cnet.com/8301-11310_39-57382925-285/how-to-remove-your-google-web-history/

"When you delete your search history from Google, it does not mean that the company stops collecting the data that you create. It still takes the information and stores it away, but it promises not to use it. If presented with a subpoena or warrant, Google would have to give that information to the appropriate parties, but there doesn't seem to be any other reason the company hangs onto it. After 18 months, the data becomes "anonymized." I asked Galperin to define "anonymized," and she said "It depends. They'll take your name off and strip some bits off the IP address." But, she added, "The extent to which [Google has] anonymized the data is unclear." She also mentioned that some research suggests that it's possible to de-anonymize data fairly easily "if you have a large enough corpus." No one would dispute that Google certainly has a very large data set. And what happens if you don't delete it? "It's unclear how long Google keeps [your information] if you don't delete your Web history," said Galperin. Leaving it alone also means that Google can give you those more personalized results it keeps promising, which Galperin notes isn't necessarily "better" or what you want."- http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2400662,00.asp

So here’s what you can do to prevent that “sharing” (selling your data):

  1. Get “Ghostery” or other browser tracker foiler. Do I believe it’ll work against the Google cookie which slips through defences? Not for a minute. Those extensions also prevent your commenting on Galleries at WC.
  2. Re: Google -

“After signing into your Google account, type https://www.google.com/history into your browser. (Alternatively, you can choose Account Settings from the pull-down menu in the upper-right corner of a Google product such as Gmail, Google+, or Google.com. From the Account Settings page, scroll down to the Services header and click on the "Go to web history" link.) If your Web History is enabled, you'll see a list of recent searches and sites visited. Click the gray Remove all Web History button at the top of the page and a subsequent OK button to clear your Web History.” - http://howto.cnet.com/8301-11310_39-57382925-285/how-to-remove-your-google-web-history/

In short? I don’t believe you’ll even evade them by not having a Google account. Even offline, they’re on you. Take “street view" for example, and the “sniffing” to see if your network was secure. I wonder who they sold that data to.

Another point regarding Google and its policies’ “impact”": Did you know that “Infopackets” (http://www.infopackets.com/) is going out of business thanks to Google?

That site has provided me, and by extension you, with good information about issues and software in the past. If you’d like to read about this issue, please avail yourselves here: http://www.infopackets.com/news/announcements/2012/20120215_infopackets_may_be_forced_to_shut_down_by_june_1_2012_please_vote.htm  and here: http://www.infopackets.com/news/announcements/2012/20120222_vote_qa_update_how_google_killed_infopackets.htm

Well, that’s just business.

It’s also a voice silenced. Mr. Dennis Faas' (CEO and publisher of Infopackets) voice. His contributers, as well.

A very nice and friendly voice, I might add. One to join so many more silenced by that “policy” change….

Well, that's the price of all that nifty stuff they and their "products" do.

You didn't really believe that there was a "Free Lunch", did you?

Update:

There are tools to help you get your data "out" of Google or to get it "in".

They are found here: http://www.dataliberation.org/

Another very good explanation of Google's Privacy Policy changes link: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2400662,00.asp

A step by step guide "How to": https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/02/how-remove-your-google-search-history-googles-new-privacy-policy-takes-effect

How to keep your searches private: https://www.eff.org/wp/six-tips-protect-your-search-privacy


Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Feb 24, 2012

Life is never as simple as it looks, that's why so many people get frustrated and angry. 

on Feb 24, 2012

There is no true privacy, on the internet or in RL, only varying levels of exposure.

on Feb 24, 2012

Oh great, now we have these Administration morons to worry about.

 

on Feb 24, 2012

Well see, I won't have a problem, don't have a Google account. 

on Feb 24, 2012

And Scroogle has folded up, including all his related sites.

on Feb 24, 2012

I've taken a liking to Chrome as a browser, in part because IE Tab is stable on it (I only use IE Tab for Outlook Web Access), but I don't trust Google.  Leaning toward going back to PaleMoon as my main browser and using IE9 for the OWA apps.

The fact that I have a gmail address (which I use only to access Google Reader) is starting to bother me.

on Feb 25, 2012

Update:

There are tools to get your info "into" and "out of" Google.

They can be found here:  http://www.dataliberation.org/

Another very good explanation of Google's Privacy Policy change: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2400662,00.asp 

A step by step "How to": https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/02/how-remove-your-google-search-history-googles-new-privacy-policy-takes-effect

How to keep your searches private: https://www.eff.org/wp/six-tips-protect-your-search-privacy

on Feb 25, 2012

Well, to start I just deleted my Google search history and removed Google from my search engine options entirely, never to be used again. Bing is just as good.

on Feb 25, 2012

LightStar
Bing is just as good.

I'm sure they are in the data mining business as well, Tom.

on Feb 25, 2012

DrJBHL

Quoting LightStar, reply 8Bing is just as good.

I'm sure they are in the data mining business as well, Tom.

 

Sheesh!

on Feb 25, 2012

DuckDuckGo isn't.  At least not yet.

on Feb 25, 2012

Which is why I use it as well as Comodo-Dragon.

on Feb 25, 2012

DrJBHL
Which is why I use it as well as Comodo-Dragon.

 

Well, I found one thing out... Comodo-Dragon is absolutely fantastic Doc! Getting rid of Firefox, IE, Palemoon and everything else too, don't need them anymore with this browser installed, and it is faster than all #&*$ too! 

on Feb 26, 2012

I'm going to keep letting Google mine my data.  I like the fact that when I'm working, and I need to find out what that over-tired resident doctor is mumbling, I can type what I phonetically hear him saying and Google figures out within just a few keystrokes, what I need to know; because Google has been mining me, figuring out the sort of direction my searches go in.  Google can figure out the new drug I'm trying to type, and how to spell it, even when drugs.com's phonetic search feature can't.  Since I get paid on production, the speed at which I can derive the answer I'm looking for means more money for me, so for my individual searching needs, in the long run, I'm being compensated for Google's data mining. 

on Feb 26, 2012

I'm going to keep letting Google mine my data

Yes, Karen. Google's really on your side.... sooo helpful.

http://linux-tipps.blogspot.com/2012/02/newest-version-of-swype-includes-dragon.html

This one you'll love, too...

http://www.imedicalapps.com/2010/01/googles-nexus-one-medical-app/

2 Pages1 2