Ramblings of an old Doc

 

 

In the United States, pre teens and teens own and use a tremendous number of mobile devices.

 

Research also found that the kids surveyed average over half an hour talking on the phone and send more than 100 text messages, every day. That is more than 3,000 a month, and at least double the number of European kids. For some it is a truly addictive behavior like tweeting. Many plans offer unlimited texts.

Relatively few seventh through twelfth graders have any established rules around mobile phone use. That might be because of lack of guidance, but it might also be due to trust between the children and parents.

The Pew Internet report is worth reading. It covers a wide range of topics related to mobile usage by teens.

Because of this area of lack of guidance, Microsoft has prepared a brochure about mobile safety. I honestly believe it’s our duty as parents to look at it as well as The Pew Report, and talk with our young. Supper time is a really good time to do it also.

This brochure from Microsoft will help you better understand the features and risks of mobile phones for kids and explain how you can teach kids to use them smartly and safely. It’s never too late until something bad happens.

Download page: Microsoft

The advice and risks also apply to other mobile devices like Kindles, iPads, etc.

Source: http://www.thewindowsclub.com/risks-of-mobile-phones-and-devices-for-kids-brochure-from-microsoft

http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Teens-and-Mobile-Phones/Introduction.aspx?view=all


Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Apr 27, 2011

@ the_Monk-  a text message from The Boss?

on Apr 27, 2011

blank

on Apr 28, 2011

Wow.  (Lucky to be alive would be a huge understatement.)

Best regards,
Steven.

on Apr 28, 2011

RedneckDude
Wish they'd come up with a way to have texting auto disable inside a moving car...lol.

Right. Passengers should not be able to text. If you are on the subway or a bus, no texting there either.

on Apr 28, 2011

done

on Apr 28, 2011

I am sorry you had a bad experience. That does not mean everyone else should have to be punished for someone else's stupidity.

I am old enough to have a wife and kids of my own.

As far as dumb, that is a personal attack and uncalled for.

on Apr 28, 2011

OK, let's cool off. We're a Community and NO personal attacks are allowed, the_Monk. 

Please edit out those comments, the_Monk and wonderloss. 

 

It's for a good reason that drivers and people crossing streets and doing mass transportation jobs are not allowed to text. It puts others' life in danger.

A passenger doing it does not.

 

Let's all just relax and communicate as equals, without insults. 

on Apr 28, 2011

done

on Apr 28, 2011

[Mod hat on]

Your attack should be edited on your own, the_Monk. It is against the TOS for this site. You are being *asked* to edit BOTH comments promptly and not to continue this.

No justifications or explanations.  

on Apr 28, 2011

the_Monk
Pardon me if you're neither, but your post implies a lack of respect for a life.  If even one single human life is saved by being inconvenient to the rest of the world then that is a price well worth it and one that usually doesn't need to be explained to an adult and/or parent.

Well just imagine how many lives we could save if we just eliminated driving all together, and everyone only biked or walked everywhere. It does not matter if it is inconvenient.

The fact of the matter is, there is no way to completely eliminate risk. There is always a balance of risk vs. cost, regardless of whether that cost is time, money, convenience, or some other factor. We make personal decisions every day, deciding what risk we are willing to accept, and what risk we are not willing to accept. To say that any prices is worth it to save one single life is unrealistic. Of course, it is also a much easier statement to make when someone else is being asked to pay the price.

2 Pages1 2