Ramblings of an old Doc
Published on April 24, 2011 By DrJBHL In Personal Computing

 

For almost a year it’s been strongly suspected and reported that Microsoft is building facial recognition technology into Windows 8 (unless you have an evil identical twin).

A "detect human presence" API is in an early copy of Windows 8, according to an article on Slashgear which links back to leaked Windows 8 images published by Windows8Italia of W8 M1.

NetworkWorld reported the following:

“By 2012 sensors such as microphones, cameras, GPS, accelerometers, and temperature and magnetic sensors will be common in most PCs, allowing Windows 8 to interact with the user's environment in new and interesting ways.

One scenario uses facial recognition software to verify a user's identity.

"Amish walks into his home office," Microsoft writes in one of many fictional scenarios outlined in the Windows 8 slide decks. "The proximity sensor on his PC detects motion, and wakes the PC. By the time Amish sits down, his PC is powered up. It scans his face and logs him in. Finally, when Amish gets up and leaves, his PC notices that he's gone and locks itself and powers down."

Password memory may also obviate the need for remembering passwords across multiple websites which would make work a lot easier.

"Password pain has reached a tipping point," Microsoft says. "Windows 8 could include a way to securely store usernames and passwords, simplifying the online experience."

It had better be one extremely secure browser (ie10) and OS, or major security and identity problems will ensue.

“That squares with another part of what Windows8Italia is reporting. According to a Google translation, the early build of Windows 8 suggests it "will be possible to access the personalization, bookmarks and content from any computer."

Kinect and Xbox Live already offer facial recognition, it should be noted, and built in cameras are standard in most computers. How difficult would it be to put facial detection into Win8? I wonder. Lenovo has offered facial recognition.

Warning: Windows8Italia offers an app “to unlock the secrets of Windows8”:

“As you read, a few days after the first leak in build 7850 of Windows 8, were already unlocked many hidden features of the new operating system.  To enable them you need to make changes to the registry, its operations are not for everyone.  So we of Windows 8 Italy , in collaboration with @ FrayxRulex, we decided to develop a practical tool, strictly in Metro-Design , and start to unlock all the secret functions of Windows 8 M1.”

I don’t recommend this, although the comments on the article seem positive. I don’t know what this app does to the registry. If you feel very “adventurous” make a system restore point and a registry backup before playing with it.

 

 

Sources:

1. http://tinyurl.com/3odwdun

2. http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/8-amazing-things-youll-do-windows-8


Comments (Page 2)
3 Pages1 2 3 
on Apr 24, 2011

Tsk tsk human presentance. What about aliens? (And no, I don't mean illegal aliens from mexico and elsewhere!)

on Apr 24, 2011

DrJBHL
He thinks as cynically as I.

We've practiced medicine for about the same length of time (I'm still at it).  Our cynicism is well-earned.

on Apr 25, 2011

EternalRequiem
Windows 7 has only been out for 2 or 3 years and they're making another OS? geez... what did they find wrong this time or what did they bork up now in windows 7

Every version of Windows is a sequel entitled The Search for More Money.

on Apr 25, 2011

DrJBHL
Think of the possibilities for rejection (Woody Allen comes to mind) and logon problems (if one gets injured and need plastic surgery or grows a beard):

 

Reduced 73%Original 600 x 600 

Ok, on a serious note.  I am not surprised.  While the technology has matured greatly, I have to ask - do we need it in the OS?  What is wrong with an add on?  The problem with Windows now is it is trying to push everything into the OS instead of allowing it to be an add on and thus code bloat is only getting worse.  just because we have 1tb drives does not mean we have to fill them!  But Microsoft seems to think we must.

on Apr 25, 2011

I have to agree with the last reply by Dr Guy. 

The home user probably doesn't need this capability.  This should be available as an add on for folks who think they need it. 

Lets face it, this is somewhat of an example of 'life imitating art', we see it in the movies and we need it.  I don't. 

on Apr 25, 2011

While I understand where Dr Guy and Philly are coming from, The same logic could be used asking "Why, if we get light from candles, do we need light bulbs?". I agree that this could be an optional feature for those sensitive about it... and can see the viewpoint that this is 'overkill'. I also can see the viewpoint that this is how progress is made and that it will lead to greater advances. I'd hate to see that squelched.

More interesting perhaps, is the rumor that W8 will be on a flash drive (although how, I can't fathom).

on Apr 25, 2011

Yea, why the hell do we need lightbulbs? 

on Apr 25, 2011

DrJBHL, we all will have our needs and desires formed and yes dictated to by our own personal environments.  Is it technology moving forward, yes.  Is it technology that will be needed by everyone that uses a computer, probably not. 

Now if this is taken to extreme and this type of verification will be the only way folks will be able to sign on to web sites, now that's a whole different story all together. 

I like it when the market place sets the needs and not developers and makers of a product or services telling the market place what it needs. 

Oh boy, I'm showing my age now. 

on Apr 25, 2011

Philly0381
The home user probably doesn't need this capability.

So let MS do like they did with Win7. Virtual capability is limited to the Pro and Ultimate versions. I see this as voluntary. It isn't an absolute necessity by any stretch unless the PTB's are headed the way of a police state. Not that we're far from it now. Good thing disabling the built webcam is possible. I disabled mine the same day I got it. 

on Apr 25, 2011

Facial recognition might be more convenient for some, but retinal scanning would probably be best... but that would be precluded in certain problems...

Yes, I believe Uvah might have a good idea there. *did I actually say that? 

on Apr 25, 2011

The other thing to keep in mind is that there will always new functions or options that get 'leaked' that are coming in the new version of an OS that a lot of time we don't see in the released version. 

I can't see the consumers having to buy a computer that has a video camera so that they can use their new computer with the new OS. 

You think a lot of folks stayed with XP? 

on Apr 25, 2011

 

blank

on Apr 25, 2011

 blank

on Apr 25, 2011

Yup, any new innovations in technology can be embedded with all kinds of stuff.  Most of which the common consumer will never know where there. 

There are those of out here that only use what we need and stay away from the rest. 

I have a cell, do I need it, no not really.  I have on of those no contact, no frills type that you put on minutes when you need them.  When I'm not in a situation where I don't need the phone on it's off.  Oh, and the cell phone is just that, a cell phone, not an entertainment device.  

on Apr 25, 2011

So is windows 9 the next one after 8 going to make you drawl Blood to logon lol lol ha ha hha haha

 

then 10 will require a Piss Test 

 

11 will require a Hair Follicle

12 well it will want your your first born

3 Pages1 2 3