Ramblings of an old Doc

 

 

Last week, McAfee reported attacks on our energy companies of a sophisticated nature.

They originated in China, however it could not be determined whether they came from a governmental, corporate or criminal entity.

Security researchers at McAfee have sounded an alarm for what is described as “coordinated covert and targeted cyberattacks” against global oil, energy, and petrochemical companies.
McAfee said the attacks began November 2009 and combined several techniques — social engineering, spear phishing and vulnerability exploits — to load custom RATs (remote administration tools) on hijacked machines.

As with the e-mail messages used in regular phishing expeditions, spear phishing messages appear to come from a trusted source. Phishing messages usually appear to come from a large and well-known company or Web site with a broad membership base, such as eBay or PayPal.

In the case of spear phishing, however, the apparent source of the e-mail is likely to be an individual within the recipient's own company and generally someone in a position of authority.

According to an article in the New York Times, spear phishing attempts are not typically initiated by "random hackers" but are more likely to be conducted by "sophisticated groups out for financial gain, trade secrets or military information."

This is a very brief summary of the (nineteen page) McAfee White Paper found HERE:

"1. Company extranet web servers compromised through SQL-injection techniques, allowing remote command execution.  
2. Commonly available hacker tools are uploaded on compromised web servers, allowing attackers to pivot into the company’s intranet and giving them access to sensitive desktops and servers internally.
3. Using password cracking and pass-the-hash tools, attackers gain additional usernames and passwords, allowing them to obtain further authenticated access to sensitive internal desktops and servers."

Initially using the company’s compromised web servers as command and control (C&C) servers, the attackers discovered that they needed only to disable Microsoft Internet Explorer (IE) proxy settings to allow direct communication from infected machines to the Internet.
Using the RAT malware, they proceeded to connect to other machines (targeting executives) and extracting email archives and other sensitive documents.

Source:  http://tinyurl.com/2v67fy7


Comments (Page 4)
5 PagesFirst 2 3 4 5 
on Feb 18, 2011

myfist0


 

Canada hit by cyber-attack from China computers:
 

Trump speaks about china. Finally someone does


Holy sh!t.... I just gained a TON of respect for the Donald. I hope he DOES run for Pres in 2012. With that kind of attitude going for him he'd have my vote in a heart beat.

on Feb 18, 2011

Add this....

The larger the country is, the more they are incline to betray their "friends". People with power tend to be bullies ...

to this...

I would agree, with a qualifier. The aims of America are not always in the best interests of its people.

or anyone else.

.....and that pretty much sums up how much of the rest of the world views the US.... especially in the Middle East.

I was talking with an Iraqi refugee who said that even though he and his people are grateful to the US for ousting Saddam Hussein, they view America with distrust and contempt.  Why?   He said that it's because the US sticks its nose in other peoples business, often when it is unwanted and usually with a view to profit somehow.

Sadly, Australia is following in those footsteps and people have become unimportant in the greater scheme of things.

on Feb 18, 2011

He said that it's because the US sticks its nose in other peoples business, often when it is unwanted and usually with a view to profit somehow.

Very true and one day Uncle Sam is gonna get that nose busted. Not from the outside but from within. There are people here who feel the same way the Iraqi refugee does. There are people here who live at or below poverty level and the Republicans want to cut funding for the programs designed to help them. Guess which one they've got their sights on. Education! Go figure.

on Feb 18, 2011

Be prepared.
HA!

on Feb 18, 2011

RavenX
Quoting DrJBHL, reply 29 Major ethnic groups in China are:

Zhuang
Uigur
Hui
Yi
Tibetan
Miao
Manchu
Mongol
Buyi
Korean


If I'm not mistaken, Doc, isn't a growing part of China religiously Christian? I know I read an article somewhere a while back about the rapidly growing number of Christians in China.

I believe the Evangelicals are growing in China, and that's not pleasing the power structure, but I was referring to ethnic, not religious groups.

on Feb 18, 2011

Meanwhile, those souls who still fret the night away worrying about the Chiacoms under the bed, there is a solution. It's quite painless, too. Attach small pictures of Milton Friedman and Leo Strauss to the skirts on your bed:

I have a Chiacom motion detector under my bed.... and if one [or several] dared to hide under my bed, it sets off an alarm that plays Lucille Ball's whiny ass voice at 98 decibels.   And for the foot locker at the end of the bed where I hide all my 'toys', there's a siren that if the lid is opened by a Chiacom it plays the sound of machine gun fire in D Flat.

I pretty much got the house covered, but I need to  do something about the garden shed.  I mean, wouldn't want 'em hiding in there, would I?  S'pose I could always install a Chiacom motion sensor that sets of a recording of excerpts of Charlie Chan's voice.  Now that phony Chiacom accent would have to really piss 'em off and ensuing sounds of discontent would alert the authorities to their location.

Very true and one day Uncle Sam is gonna get that nose busted. Not from the outside but from within. There are people here who feel the same way the Iraqi refugee does.

I'll tell you what, matey, there are political figures from around the world who mutter the same things under their breath... that the US Government got too big for its boots at the behest of the arms dealers/manufacturers.  Again, here we have the corporate world active in political and world events where they have no business being, but are because dumb ass politicians sure know how to start a war.  And what really pisses me off is that when these corporate thugs cannot take over what they want by fair means [or foul] they send in the military to take it by force,

Some might argue that is simply not true, but one only has to look as how many US politicos are in the arms business, oil and/or banking.  Three of the greediest industries on earth.... and they are never far removed from government kickbacks, interventions and/or collusion.

I'm not normally a violent person, but sometimes I think the world would be better off if there were more political and corporate assassinations to show the bastards that we the people don't like their shit and will no longer tolerate it.

on Feb 18, 2011

I was talking with an Iraqi refugee who said that even though he and his people are grateful to the US for ousting Saddam Hussein, they view America with distrust and contempt. Why? He said that it's because the US sticks its nose in other peoples business, often when it is unwanted and usually with a view to profit somehow.

You'd have to wonder about a fellow like that. I mean, here he benefited [from the death and maiming of Americans] yet comes off as a major churl, doesn't he?

So, he wanted to be a virtual slave of Saddam's? I'm not saying that we had a right to invade Iraq, however. Saddam sort of precipitated/played into Bush's/Energy Corp.'s hands by pretending to have WMD's, didn't he?

I'm not normally a violent person, but sometimes I think the world would be better off if there were more political and corporate assassinations to show the bastards that we the people don't like their shit and will no longer tolerate it.

I believe there are other ways to accomplish that.

 

on Feb 18, 2011

Scoutdog
The aims of America are not always in the best interests of its people.

That is a great qualifier.  But I would ask for further clarification.  Do you believe the policy makers (those making the aims of America) think it is in the best interests?  or that they are clearly working to subvert the best interests of its people?

on Feb 18, 2011

I have a Chiacom motion detector under my bed.... and if one [or several] dared to hide under my bed, it sets off an alarm that plays Lucille Ball's whiny ass voice at 98 decibels.

Mine plays Fran Dreschers!   Have you ever seen a Chicom explode?

 

on Feb 18, 2011

Or perhaps what Scoutdog believes are the best interests of its people?

on Feb 18, 2011

You'd have to wonder about a fellow like that. I mean, here he benefited [from the death and maiming of Americans] yet comes off as a major churl, doesn't he?

Um, I think his dislike, contempt or whatever was/is aimed at the very people American citizens condemn for their actions, not towards the troops who liberated them.  As he said, the profit motivation was too great for bush to ignore... that had Iraq been devoid of oil Hussein would still be seated on the throne.   Frankly, I agree with the sentiment!!  I mean, what did Bush offer the people of Zimbabwe when Mugabe was into the wholesale butchering of his people?   Nothing, that's what.... ZILCH.   And why?  There was/is no oil!

I believe there are other ways to accomplish that.

So do I!  That's why I'm not normally a persons who condones/advocates violence.   However, desperate times call for desperate measures, and attempting to vote the bastards out of office, asking/begging for better corporate controls keep failing time and time again.  The mongrels seem impervious to the fair and decent methods we try to get a better deal, so maybe it is time for them to attempt catching a few bullets between the teeth. 

Yup bump off a dozen or three and the rest start thinking about their mortality and what they need to do to stay alive.  The answer to that is quite simple... become decent human beings with consideration for their fellow man/women, and they earn a tacit reprieve.... which can be reealed the moment their greed instinct rears its ugly head.

Yes Doc, I know, you are in the business of saving/preserving human life.  The thing is, though, these parasites ceased to be human when they became rabid corporate animals who seek to tear each other and anyone else who gets in their way apart.  Sorry [not really] but I cannot respect anyone who seeks to to put profit above all other considerations, including human life and compassion for others.

on Feb 18, 2011

I Still feel as though he's an ingrate, at best. What does he care what the motive was as long as he's free?

I also think that it isn't necessary to become a Robespierre to correct the abuses of royalty. It requires steady, unrelenting effort on the law makers and regulatory investigators to bring about reform.

on Feb 18, 2011

I Still feel as though he's an ingrate, at best. What does he care what the motive was as long as he's free?
You're assuming that the only change was that he became "free". Iraq got pretty bad after the invasion, and is still pretty bad. Freedom is all well and good, but when you don't have electricity or water or sanitation and your friends are getting gunned down by soldiers and theocrats, you start to realize that order is important, too. I'm not saying that Saddam was a good guy. He wasn't. He was a very, very bad guy. But to me, and I imagine to a lot of Iraqis, it was worth something that he at least created an environment where if you kept your head down and toed the party line you at least had a reasonably good chance of not getting killed. The country's starting to rebuild itself now, but the central government is still only one player among a lot of political groups, and the streets are still unsafe for anyone who doesn't have their own security.

on Feb 18, 2011

One can only really view things from his own context, I guess. I concur that conditions there were bad and got worse, but they are recovering and the monster is gone, at the cost of American and Iraqi life.

Still, that man wouldn't be free today were it not for our effort and blood. From the information available, he didn't bleed...but he's free. If I were kin to one of the dead I might resent that, although he could be to one of the Iraqi dead. He might also have had a better set up under Saddam (which he isn't admitting) and be resentful because of that...who knows?

on Feb 18, 2011

Plus, there's the fact that a good ten thousand Iraqis died in that fight, either directly killed by American soldiers or as a result of the near-anarchy that they caused. I'm pretty sure those people would not have died under Saddam, and they won't ever be coming back.

Also, one must consider that Saddam was more or less secular. The current Iraqi government, however, seems to be listing towards the theocratic, and theocracies in general (of any religion) seem to have a tendency to oppress women. So it's entirely possible that around 50% of the population will end up being significantly less free.

And lastly, is it really right to consider America responsible for the fact that Iraq reassembled itself as a nominal democracy? If another strongman had seized power and implemented a more totalitarian regime, would that have been America's doing as well?

5 PagesFirst 2 3 4 5